Philip Pratt

2.0k citations
66 papers · 1.5k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Philip Pratt

66 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Philip Pratt
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 651
  • Health Informatics 19
  • Surgery 546
  • Human-Computer Interaction 80
  • Biomedical Engineering 452
Replace Philip Edwards with:
Philip Edwards United Kingdom
Greg Osgood United States
Tobias Blum Germany
Stéphane Nicolau France
Elvis C. S. Chen Canada
Junjun Pan China
Stamatia Giannarou United Kingdom
Anton Deguet United States
Michael Figl Austria
Ramin Shahidi United States
Philip Pratt relative to Philip Edwards United Kingdom Philip Edwards's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Philip Edwards · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Pratt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Pratt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Pratt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Pratt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Pratt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Pratt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Pratt. The network helps show where Philip Pratt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Pratt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Pratt Line = papers co-authored together Philip Pratt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018239
2 2010156
3 201781
4 201374
5 202058
6 201256
7 201052
8 201647
9 201442
10 202140
11 201538
12 201336
13 201434
14 201534
15 201328
16 201527
17
Concepts of Database Management
199427
18 201525
19 201424
20 201723

About Philip Pratt

Philip Pratt is a scholar working on Surgery, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Biomedical Engineering, Aerospace Engineering and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Surgical Simulation and Training (24 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (13 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (11 papers), Soft Robotics and Applications (10 papers), Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (6 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (5 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (4 papers) and Advanced Vision and Imaging (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (651 citations), Health Informatics (19 citations), Surgery (546 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (80 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (452 citations). Philip Pratt has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Guang‐Zhong Yang, Ara Darzi, Erik Mayer, Archie Hughes‐Hallett, Justin Vale, Danail Stoyanov, Dimitri Amiras, Hani J. Marcus, Graham Lawton and Jonathan Simmons. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Surgery, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, Urology, Surgical Endoscopy and Lecture notes in computer science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact