Michael Figl

3.1k citations
126 papers · 2.5k · h-index 32

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Figl

122 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Michael Figl
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Oral Surgery 377
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 786
  • Radiation 296
  • Orthodontics 94
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 489
Replace Wolfgang Birkfellner with:
Wolfgang Birkfellner Austria
Peter Homolka Austria
Ken Masamune Japan
Felix Wanschitz Austria
Jay B. West United States
Yoshito Otake Japan
Philip Edwards United Kingdom
Robert L. Galloway United States
Stéphane Lavallée France
Bulat Ibragimov Denmark
Michael Figl relative to Wolfgang Birkfellner Austria Wolfgang Birkfellner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Wolfgang Birkfellner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Figl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Figl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Figl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Figl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Figl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Figl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Figl. The network helps show where Michael Figl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Figl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Figl Line = papers co-authored together Michael Figl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 126 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002157
2 2005123
3 2002102
4 200491
5 200285
6 200684
7 200577
8 201177
9 200564
10 200763
11 200262
12 200456
13
Measurement of volume changes after sinus floor augmentation with a phycogenic hydroxyapatite.
200656
14 200255
15 200354
16 201045
17 201441
18 200641
19 200940
20 201139

About Michael Figl

Michael Figl is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery and Radiation, having authored 126 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Surgical Simulation and Training (31 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (25 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (24 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (22 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (22 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (21 papers), Soft Robotics and Applications (16 papers) and Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oral Surgery (377 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (786 citations), Radiation (296 citations), Orthodontics (94 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (489 citations). Michael Figl has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Wolfgang Birkfellner, Helmar Bergmann, Johann Hummel, Kurt Schicho, Arne Wagner, Rudolf Seemann, Felix Wanschitz, Rolf Ewers, Franz Watzinger and Rudolf Hanel. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Physics, Physics in Medicine and Biology, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Scientific Reports and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact