Philip Luck
Impact in
-
- Global trade and economics
- Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
- Economic Theory and Policy
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
- Economic theories and models
Papers in
-
- Migration and Labor Dynamics 2
- Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice 1
-
- Global trade and economics 4
- Co-authors
- Maurice Obstfeld (1 shared paper)K. Russ (1 shared paper)Robert C. Feenstra (1 shared paper)Hani Mansour (2 shared papers)Chloe N. East (2 shared papers)Nicholas Bloom (1 shared paper)Kyle Handley (1 shared paper)André Kurmann (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Critical Sociology (1 paper)The Review of Economics and Statistics (1 paper)Journal of Labor Economics (1 paper)Journal of Economic Geography (1 paper)Review of International Economics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Philip Luck
7 papers receiving 188 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 126
- Economics and Econometrics 108
- Finance 34
- Strategy and Management 38
- Development 6
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Luck
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Luck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Luck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Luck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Luck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Luck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Luck. The network helps show where Philip Luck may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Philip Luck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 138 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 24 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 16 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 5 | The Impact of Chinese Trade on U.S. Employment: The Good, The Bad, and The Apocryphal | 2019 | 7 |
| 6 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 1 |
About Philip Luck
Philip Luck is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management and General Health Professions, having authored 7 papers that have together received 201 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global trade and economics (4 papers), International Business and FDI (2 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (2 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (2 papers), Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (1 paper), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (1 paper), Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture (1 paper) and Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (126 citations), Economics and Econometrics (108 citations), Finance (34 citations), Strategy and Management (38 citations) and Development (6 citations). Philip Luck has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Maurice Obstfeld, K. Russ, Robert C. Feenstra, Hani Mansour, Chloe N. East, Nicholas Bloom, Kyle Handley and André Kurmann. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Sociology, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Journal of Labor Economics, Journal of Economic Geography and Review of International Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.