Nicholas Bloom
Impact in
-
- Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
- Global trade and economics
- Economics and Econometrics top 0.01%
- Market Dynamics and Volatility
- Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
- Firm Innovation and Growth
- Economic Growth and Productivity
Papers in
-
- Firm Innovation and Growth 43
- Market Dynamics and Volatility 41
- Economic Growth and Productivity 34
- COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts 21
- Energy, Environment, Economic Growth 13
-
- Monetary Policy and Economic Impact 36
- Global trade and economics 18
- Co-authors
- John Van Reenen (68 shared papers)Steven J. Davis (52 shared papers)Scott Baker (16 shared papers)Raffaella Sadun (29 shared papers)John Roberts (4 shared papers)Philippe Aghion (8 shared papers)Richard Blundell (2 shared papers)Peter Howitt (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- American Economic Review (10 papers)The Quarterly Journal of Economics (7 papers)Fiscal Studies (4 papers)The Review of Economic Studies (4 papers)The Journal of Economic Perspectives (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomMexico
In The Last Decade
Nicholas Bloom
190 papers receiving 28.3k citations
Nicholas Bloom's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 161
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8.5k
- Economics and Econometrics 21.8k
- Finance 6.5k
- Accounting 5.7k
- General Energy 279
Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Bloom
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Bloom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Bloom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Bloom more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Bloom
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Bloom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Bloom. The network helps show where Nicholas Bloom may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Bloom, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 213 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty* Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 7360 |
| 2 | The Impact of Uncertainty Shocks Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 3786 |
| 3 | Measuring and Explaining Management Practices Across Firms and Countries Hit paper breakdown → | 2007 | 1563 |
| 4 | Competition and Innovation: An Inverted U Relationship Hit paper breakdown → | 2004 | 1319 |
| 5 | Fluctuations in Uncertainty Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 1293 |
| 6 | The Unprecedented Stock Market Reaction to COVID-19 Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 1046 |
| 7 | Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment* Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 1019 |
| 8 | Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 975 |
| 9 | Why Do Management Practices Differ across Firms and Countries? Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 867 |
| 10 | Trade Induced Technical Change? The Impact of Chinese Imports on Innovation, IT and Productivity Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 824 |
| 11 | Economic uncertainty before and during the COVID-19 pandemic Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 663 |
| 12 | Really Uncertain Business Cycles Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 652 |
| 13 | Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 578 |
| 14 | Americans Do IT Better: US Multinationals and the Productivity Miracle Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 565 |
| 15 | The Organization of Firms Across Countries* Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 431 |
| 16 | Does management matter? Evidence from India Hit paper breakdown → | 2011 | 401 |
| 17 | Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find? Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 395 |
| 18 | Competition and Innovation: an Inverted-U Relationship Hit paper breakdown → | 2005 | 379 |
| 19 | Firming Up Inequality* Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 367 |
| 20 | 2006 | 366 |
About Nicholas Bloom
Nicholas Bloom is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Finance, Sociology and Political Science and Accounting, having authored 213 papers that have together received 30.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Firm Innovation and Growth (43 papers), Market Dynamics and Volatility (41 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (36 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (34 papers), COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts (21 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (18 papers), Global trade and economics (18 papers) and Energy, Environment, Economic Growth (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (8.5k citations), Economics and Econometrics (21.8k citations), Finance (6.5k citations), Accounting (5.7k citations) and General Energy (279 citations). Nicholas Bloom has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include John Van Reenen, Steven J. Davis, Scott Baker, Raffaella Sadun, John Roberts, Philippe Aghion, Richard Blundell, Peter Howitt, Mark Schankerman and Mirko Draca. Their work appears in journals such as American Economic Review, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Fiscal Studies, The Review of Economic Studies and The Journal of Economic Perspectives.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.