Felipe Benguria

668 citations
31 papers · 248 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Felipe Benguria

27 papers receiving 230 citations

Peers

Felipe Benguria
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 134
  • Economics and Econometrics 180
  • Finance 39
  • Strategy and Management 44
  • Accounting 17
Replace Monique Ebell with:
Monique Ebell United Kingdom
Gábor Kátay Belgium
John Lopresti United States
Andrew Greenland United States
Reshad N. Ahsan Australia
Lourenço S. Paz United States
Paul Lengermann United States
Maximiliano Dvorkin United States
Nicolas Dromel France
Cristina Terra Brazil
Felipe Benguria relative to Monique Ebell United Kingdom Monique Ebell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18×
Monique Ebell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Felipe Benguria

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Felipe Benguria's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Felipe Benguria with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Felipe Benguria more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Felipe Benguria

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Felipe Benguria. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Felipe Benguria. The network helps show where Felipe Benguria may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Felipe Benguria, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Felipe Benguria Line = papers co-authored together Felipe Benguria links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201838
2 201729
3 202019
4 202118
5 201716
6 201914
7 202012
8 202211
9 202111
10 20179
11 20238
12 20177
13 20157
14 20196
15 20235
16 20245
17 20224
18 20224
19 20233
20 20213

About Felipe Benguria

Felipe Benguria is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Strategy and Management and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 31 papers that have together received 248 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global trade and economics (20 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (9 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (7 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (6 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (5 papers), Global Trade and Competitiveness (5 papers), International Business and FDI (4 papers) and Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (134 citations), Economics and Econometrics (180 citations), Finance (39 citations), Strategy and Management (44 citations) and Accounting (17 citations). Felipe Benguria has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Christian Moser, Jorge Álvarez, Niklas Engbom, Alan M. Taylor, Josh Ederington, Sergio Urzúa, Rodrigo Wagner, Tim Schmidt‐Eisenlohr, Chris Vickers and Deborah L. Swenson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of International Economics, Journal of Financial Economics, American Economic Journal Macroeconomics, Economics Letters and Review of International Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact