Philip Jonathan

3.7k citations
157 papers · 2.9k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Philip Jonathan

150 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

Philip Jonathan
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Oceanography 825
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 336
  • Earth-Surface Processes 315
  • Environmental Engineering 562
  • Global and Planetary Change 786
Replace Anne‐Catherine Favre with:
Anne‐Catherine Favre France
David D. Jackson United States
Petra Friederichs Germany
Karl K. Sabelfeld Russia
Nan Chen United States
Christian L. E. Franzke Germany
Gary Froyland Australia
Marc Bocquet France
Diane L. Evans United States
Cees G. H. Diks Netherlands
Philip Jonathan relative to Anne‐Catherine Favre France Anne‐Catherine Favre's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.4×
Anne‐Catherine Favre · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Jonathan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Jonathan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Jonathan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Jonathan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Jonathan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Jonathan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Jonathan. The network helps show where Philip Jonathan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Jonathan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Jonathan Line = papers co-authored together Philip Jonathan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 157 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995177
2 2013133
3 2006108
4 199794
5 199790
6 201188
7 198877
8 201073
9 201064
10 202160
11 201357
12 198756
13 200853
14 201652
15 201650
16 200850
17 200743
18 201342
19 200041
20 201341

About Philip Jonathan

Philip Jonathan is a scholar working on Oceanography, Global and Planetary Change, Finance, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Atmospheric Science, having authored 157 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing (50 papers), Climate variability and models (37 papers), Hydrology and Drought Analysis (32 papers), Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling (32 papers), Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (25 papers), Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes (20 papers), Wind and Air Flow Studies (18 papers) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oceanography (825 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (336 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (315 citations), Environmental Engineering (562 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (786 citations). Philip Jonathan has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Kevin Ewans, David Randell, Paul H. Taylor, Paul J. Northrop, A.G. Brenton, W. J. Krzanowski, Mark Roland Thomas, J. H. Beynon, Jonathan A. Tawn and Ed Mackay. Their work appears in journals such as Ocean Engineering, Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Environmetrics, Journal of Chemometrics and Coastal Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact