Countries where authors publish in Coastal Engineering
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Coastal Engineering. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Coastal Engineering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Coastal Engineering more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Coastal Engineering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Coastal Engineering.
About Coastal Engineering
The 3.8k papers published in Coastal Engineering in the last decades have received a total of 140.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Coastal Engineering usually cover Earth-Surface Processes (2.9k papers), Oceanography (1.4k papers), Atmospheric Science (1.1k papers), Ecology (1.2k papers) and Ocean Engineering (453 papers) specifically the topics of Coastal and Marine Dynamics (2.9k papers), Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing (1.3k papers), Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (1.0k papers), Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (970 papers), Aeolian processes and effects (541 papers), Wave and Wind Energy Systems (349 papers), Geological formations and processes (331 papers) and Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions (320 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Coastal Engineering are Íñigo J. Losada, Dano Roelvink, Per A. Madsen, Javier L. Lara, Peter Nielsen, Marcel Zijlema, R. A. Holman, Ian L. Turner, James T. Kirby and M.J.F. Stive.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.