Phil Parvin

478 citations
24 papers · 221 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Phil Parvin

21 papers receiving 196 citations

Peers

Phil Parvin
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Communication 51
  • Political Science and International Relations 108
  • Public Administration 10
  • Urban Studies 13
  • Sociology and Political Science 92
Replace John Coggin with:
John Coggin United States
Ana Maria Belchior Portugal
Petr Voda Czechia
Luke Temple United Kingdom
Nicholas Startin United Kingdom
Moshe Haspel United States
Scott Minkoff United States
Juan Rodríguez Teruel Spain
Astrid Barrio Spain
Daniel Hellinger United States
Phil Parvin relative to John Coggin United States John Coggin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
John Coggin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phil Parvin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phil Parvin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phil Parvin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phil Parvin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phil Parvin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phil Parvin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phil Parvin. The network helps show where Phil Parvin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Phil Parvin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phil Parvin Line = papers co-authored together Phil Parvin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201771
2 200930
3 201517
4 202112
5 200911
6 200911
7 202010
8 20097
9 20196
10 20186
11
Localism and the left: the need for strong central government
20116
12 20186
13 20085
14 20165
15 20174
16 20054
17
Silencing the critics: Charities, lobbyists, and the government's quiet war on dissent
20164
18 20112
19
What Kind of Dialogue Do We Need? Gender, deliberative democracy and comprehensive values
20131
20
Power to the people or entrenching inequality?
20101

About Phil Parvin

Phil Parvin is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Education and History, having authored 24 papers that have together received 221 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (9 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (6 papers), Social Media and Politics (5 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (4 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (4 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (2 papers) and Political Systems and Governance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (51 citations), Political Science and International Relations (108 citations), Public Administration (10 citations), Urban Studies (13 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (92 citations). Phil Parvin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rod Dacombe, Ben Saunders and Clare Chambers. Their work appears in journals such as Political Studies Review, Representation, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Res Publica and The Monist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact