Daniel Hellinger

552 citations
40 papers · 328 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Hellinger

32 papers receiving 217 citations

Peers

Daniel Hellinger
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Political Science and International Relations 201
  • Linguistics and Language 29
  • Sociology and Political Science 217
  • Communication 30
  • Development 12
Replace James L. Payne with:
James L. Payne United States
Farish A. Noor Singapore
Jean‐Baptiste Harguindéguy Spain
Kenneth Bunker Chile
María Pilar García‐Guadilla Venezuela
Sergio Toro Chile
Neil Ketchley United Kingdom
Régis Dandoy Belgium
Timothy S. Rich United States
Daniela R. Piccio Italy
Daniel Hellinger relative to James L. Payne United States James L. Payne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.3×
James L. Payne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Hellinger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Hellinger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Hellinger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Hellinger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Hellinger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Hellinger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Hellinger. The network helps show where Daniel Hellinger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Hellinger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Hellinger Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Hellinger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200346
2 201844
3 199228
4 198424
5 200323
6 200520
7 200216
8 201614
9
The Democratic Facade
199112
10
Comparative Politics of Latin America: Democracy at Last?
201112
11 199610
12 20118
13 19788
14 20068
15 20117
16 20165
17 20035
18 20115
19 19784
20 20074

About Daniel Hellinger

Daniel Hellinger is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Linguistics and Language, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Anthropology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 328 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Politics and Society in Latin America (12 papers), Cultural and political discourse analysis (5 papers), Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America (5 papers), International Relations in Latin America (5 papers), Public Policy and Governance (3 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (3 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (3 papers) and Economic Theory and Policy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (201 citations), Linguistics and Language (29 citations), Sociology and Political Science (217 citations), Communication (30 citations) and Development (12 citations). Daniel Hellinger has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Steve Ellner, Kenneth Maxwell and Dennis R. Judd. Their work appears in journals such as Latin American Perspectives, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Foreign Affairs, Refugee Survey Quarterly and Hispanic American Historical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact