Countries where authors publish in Political Studies Review
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Political Studies Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Political Studies Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Political Studies Review more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Political Studies Review
This network shows the impact of papers published in Political Studies Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Political Studies Review.
About Political Studies Review
The 798 papers published in Political Studies Review in the last decades have received a total of 10.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Political Studies Review usually cover Political Science and International Relations (491 papers), Communication (79 papers), Public Administration (35 papers), Gender Studies (69 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (313 papers) specifically the topics of Electoral Systems and Political Participation (173 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (92 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (80 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (75 papers), Social Media and Politics (75 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (55 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (54 papers) and Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (53 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Political Studies Review are Christopher Pollitt, Paul Cairney, Andrew Jordan, David Benson, Simon Hix, Martín Lodge, Kevin Ward, Eugene McCann, Tim Haughton and Oliver James.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.