Political Studies Review

734 papers and 7.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 734 papers published in Political Studies Review in the last decades have received a total of 7.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Political Studies Review usually cover Political Science and International Relations (459 papers), Sociology and Political Science (284 papers) and Communication (70 papers) specifically the topics of Electoral Systems and Political Participation (161 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (90 papers) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (78 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Political Studies Review are Christopher Pollitt, Paul Cairney, David Benson, Andrew Jordan, Simon Hix, Eugene McCann, Kevin Ward, Martín Lodge, Tim Haughton and Benny Geys.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Political Studies Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Political Studies Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Political Studies Review.

Countries where authors publish in Political Studies Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Political Studies Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Political Studies Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Political Studies Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025