Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences

10.7k citations
296 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

Papers in

Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences

295 papers receiving 10.3k citations

Peers

Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 184
  • Computer Networks and Communications 3.6k
  • Information Systems 3.1k
  • Signal Processing 1.3k
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2.0k
  • Human-Computer Interaction 545
Replace ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems with:
ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems United States
ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems United States
Big Data Mining and Analytics China
Applied Computing and Informatics India
Journal of Internet Services and Applications Brazil
Swarm Intelligence United States
Synthesis lectures on artificial intelligence and machine learning United States
International Journal of Information Management Data Insights India
IEEE Cloud Computing United States
International Journal of Web Information Systems Japan
Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences relative to ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems United States ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences.

About Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences

The 296 papers published in Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 10.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences usually cover Human-Computer Interaction (31 papers), Computer Networks and Communications (87 papers), Information Systems (77 papers), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (71 papers) and Computer Science Applications (18 papers) specifically the topics of IoT and Edge/Fog Computing (28 papers), Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (20 papers), Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data (18 papers), Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis (16 papers), User Authentication and Security Systems (15 papers), Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing (14 papers), Cloud Computing and Resource Management (13 papers) and Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (13 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences are Alireza Souri, Rahil Hosseini, Daya Krishan Lobiyal, Jungho Kang, Sang‐Woon Kim, Joon‐Min Gil, Amir Masoud Rahmani, Jong Hyuk (James) Park, Jun‐Ho Huh and Buddha Singh.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact