Phil Drew

952 citations
11 papers · 657 · 1 hit paper · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Phil Drew

11 papers receiving 626 citations

Phil Drew's Hit Papers

Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial 2010 · 444 citations
4440+5+10Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Phil Drew
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Cancer Research 298
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 207
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 134
  • Oncology 83
  • Surgery 61
Replace Sally M. Knox with:
Sally M. Knox United States
Jennifer Chun United States
Patricia A. Cronin United States
Miles Howe United Kingdom
Cristina Olcese United States
C.E. Cox United States
Monica L. Huang United States
A. Cardillo Italy
Christine A. Wynveen United States
Christina A. Dilaveri United States
Phil Drew relative to Sally M. Knox United States Sally M. Knox's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×19.5×
Sally M. Knox · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phil Drew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phil Drew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phil Drew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phil Drew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phil Drew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phil Drew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phil Drew. The network helps show where Phil Drew may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phil Drew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phil Drew Line = papers co-authored together Phil Drew links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1
Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial
Hit paper breakdown →
2010444
2 201062
3 200656
4 200238
5
Optimal education techniques for basic surgical trainees: lessons from education theory.
199932
6 200110
7 20046
8 20085
9 20072
10 20051
11 20131

About Phil Drew

Phil Drew is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cancer Research, Oncology and Biotechnology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 657 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (3 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (2 papers), Gene expression and cancer classification (2 papers), Cancer Research and Treatments (2 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (1 paper), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (298 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (207 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (134 citations), Oncology (83 citations) and Surgery (61 citations). Phil Drew has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Vicky Napp, Sarah Brown, Julia Brown, Catherine Olivier, Ian Harvey, Lindsay W. Turnbull, Andrew M. Hanby, John Greenman, Vivek Rao and Charlotte E. Dyer. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Oncology, European Journal of Surgical Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Health Technology Assessment and The Lancet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact