Phil Drew
Impact in
-
- MRI in cancer diagnosis
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Papers in
-
- MRI in cancer diagnosis 3
-
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Sarah Brown (3 shared papers)Vicky Napp (3 shared papers)Ian Harvey (3 shared papers)Julia M. Brown (2 shared papers)Lindsay W. Turnbull (1 shared paper)Andrew M. Hanby (1 shared paper)John Greenman (3 shared papers)Charlotte E. Dyer (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- International Journal of Oncology (2 papers)European Journal of Surgical Oncology (2 papers)The Lancet (1 paper)Health Technology Assessment (1 paper)Journal of Clinical Pathology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Phil Drew
10 papers receiving 667 citations
Phil Drew's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 377
- Cancer Research 152
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 105
- Oncology 50
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 54
Countries citing papers authored by Phil Drew
This map shows the geographic impact of Phil Drew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phil Drew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phil Drew more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Phil Drew
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phil Drew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phil Drew. The network helps show where Phil Drew may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Phil Drew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 501 |
| 2 | 2010 | 70 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 58 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 38 | |
| 5 | Optimal education techniques for basic surgical trainees: lessons from education theory. | 1999 | 32 |
| 6 | 2001 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 1 |
About Phil Drew
Phil Drew is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cancer Research, Genetics, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Surgery, having authored 10 papers that have together received 727 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include MRI in cancer diagnosis (3 papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (2 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (1 paper), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (1 paper), Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions (1 paper), Surgical Simulation and Training (1 paper) and Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (377 citations), Cancer Research (152 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (105 citations), Oncology (50 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (54 citations). Phil Drew has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Brown, Vicky Napp, Ian Harvey, Julia M. Brown, Lindsay W. Turnbull, Andrew M. Hanby, John Greenman, Charlotte E. Dyer, LW Turnbull and Lynn Cawkwell. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Oncology, European Journal of Surgical Oncology, The Lancet, Health Technology Assessment and Journal of Clinical Pathology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.