Julia Brown
Impact in
- Oncology top 0.05%
- Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
- Cancer survivorship and care
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
- Occupational Therapy top 0.02%
- Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Papers in
- Oncology 81
- Cancer survivorship and care 31
- Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments 21
-
- Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics 22
- Co-authors
- David Jayne (37 shared papers)Philip Quirke (16 shared papers)H. Thorpe (16 shared papers)Galina Velikova (46 shared papers)P J Guillou (6 shared papers)Peter J. Selby (18 shared papers)Adrian Smith (2 shared papers)Richard M. Heath (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- British Journal of Cancer (25 papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (16 papers)Trials (16 papers)Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (11 papers)British journal of surgery (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Julia Brown
316 papers receiving 24.0k citations
Julia Brown's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 189
- Oncology 8.9k
- Occupational Therapy 1.4k
- Hematology 2.0k
- Hepatology 1.1k
- Cancer Research 1.9k
Countries citing papers authored by Julia Brown
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Brown more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Brown
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Brown. The network helps show where Julia Brown may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Brown, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 325 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial Hit paper breakdown → | 2005 | 2348 |
| 2 | High-Dose Chemotherapy with Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Rescue for Multiple Myeloma Hit paper breakdown → | 2003 | 1348 |
| 3 | Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection of Colorectal Carcinoma: 3-Year Results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group Hit paper breakdown → | 2007 | 1112 |
| 4 | Measuring Quality of Life in Routine Oncology Practice Improves Communication and Patient Well-Being: A Randomized Controlled Trial Hit paper breakdown → | 2004 | 1079 |
| 5 | Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 895 |
| 6 | Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 739 |
| 7 | Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial Hit paper breakdown → | 2011 | 712 |
| 8 | Impact of Pressure Ulcers on Quality of Life in Older Patients: A Systematic Review Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 529 |
| 9 | Patient risk factors for pressure ulcer development: Systematic review Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 511 |
| 10 | 2010 | 479 | |
| 11 | Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventionalversuslaparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 473 |
| 12 | Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 444 |
| 13 | Evidence for acutely hypoxic cells in mouse tumours, and a possible mechanism of reoxygenation Hit paper breakdown → | 1979 | 427 |
| 14 | 2007 | 399 | |
| 15 | Disulfiram modulated ROS–MAPK and NFκB pathways and targeted breast cancer cells with cancer stem cell-like properties Hit paper breakdown → | 2011 | 360 |
| 16 | 2012 | 341 | |
| 17 | 1993 | 313 | |
| 18 | 1999 | 288 | |
| 19 | 2005 | 274 | |
| 20 | 2003 | 271 |
About Julia Brown
Julia Brown is a scholar working on Oncology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Cancer Research, having authored 325 papers that have together received 24.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (31 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (22 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (21 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (19 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (18 papers), Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments (15 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (14 papers) and Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (8.9k citations), Occupational Therapy (1.4k citations), Hematology (2.0k citations), Hepatology (1.1k citations) and Cancer Research (1.9k citations). Julia Brown has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include David Jayne, Philip Quirke, H. Thorpe, Galina Velikova, P J Guillou, Peter J. Selby, Adrian Smith, Richard M. Heath, Joanne Copeland and Joanne M. Walker. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Trials, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and British journal of surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.