C.E. Cox
Impact in
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Papers in
-
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 10
-
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas 7
- Co-authors
- Douglas S. Reintgen (7 shared papers)Solange Pendas (3 shared papers)Ni Ni Ku (3 shared papers)Alan R. Shons (2 shared papers)Siddharth S. Bass (2 shared papers)T. Yeatman (2 shared papers)Claudia G. Berman (3 shared papers)Harvey Greenberg (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Surgical Oncology (3 papers)The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon (1 paper)JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (1 paper)Machine Vision and Applications (1 paper)Annals of Surgical Oncology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyIndia
In The Last Decade
C.E. Cox
19 papers receiving 361 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Cancer Research 173
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 133
- Oncology 151
- Dermatology 24
- Neurology 32
Countries citing papers authored by C.E. Cox
This map shows the geographic impact of C.E. Cox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.E. Cox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.E. Cox more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C.E. Cox
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.E. Cox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.E. Cox. The network helps show where C.E. Cox may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside C.E. Cox, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 93 | |
| 2 | Lymphatic mapping in the treatment of breast cancer. | 1998 | 68 |
| 3 | 1993 | 38 | |
| 4 | 1992 | 35 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 33 | |
| 6 | 1998 | 26 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 17 | |
| 8 | 1993 | 17 | |
| 9 | 1982 | 12 | |
| 10 | 1992 | 9 | |
| 11 | Comparison of surgical adrenalectomy to medical adrenalectomy in patients with metastatic carcinoma of the breast. | 1982 | 8 |
| 12 | 2004 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1995 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1993 | 1 |
About C.E. Cox
C.E. Cox is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Surgery and Epidemiology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 378 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (10 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (7 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (4 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (2 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (2 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers) and Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (173 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (133 citations), Oncology (151 citations), Dermatology (24 citations) and Neurology (32 citations). C.E. Cox has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and India. Frequent co-authors include Douglas S. Reintgen, Solange Pendas, Ni Ni Ku, Alan R. Shons, Siddharth S. Bass, T. Yeatman, Claudia G. Berman, Harvey Greenberg, James W. Jakub and Mary Gardner. Their work appears in journals such as Surgical Oncology, The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Machine Vision and Applications and Annals of Surgical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.