Petra De Block
Impact in
- Horticulture top 5%
- Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
-
- Plant Diversity and Evolution
- Plant and animal studies
Papers in
-
- Plant Diversity and Evolution 51
- Plant and animal studies 29
- Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics 5
-
- Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions 19
- Co-authors
- Elmar Robbrecht (18 shared papers)Steven Dessein (12 shared papers)Erik Smets (13 shared papers)Piero G. Delprete (1 shared paper)Inge Groeninckx (6 shared papers)W. Oehlert (2 shared papers)Brecht Verstraete (7 shared papers)Suzy Huysmans (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society (6 papers)Taxon (6 papers)Phytotaxa (4 papers)Annals of Botany (1 paper)PeerJ (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Petra De Block
58 papers receiving 627 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Horticulture 38
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 470
- Forestry 57
- Molecular Biology 344
- Plant Science 183
Countries citing papers authored by Petra De Block
This map shows the geographic impact of Petra De Block's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Petra De Block with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Petra De Block more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Petra De Block
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Petra De Block. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Petra De Block. The network helps show where Petra De Block may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Petra De Block, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 60 | |
| 2 | 1963 | 47 | |
| 3 | 1999 | 47 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 41 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 38 | |
| 6 | A survey of secondary pollen presentation in the Rubiaceae | 1996 | 36 |
| 7 | 2015 | 33 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 27 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 26 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 24 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 19 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 17 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 16 | |
| 15 | 1995 | 15 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 14 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 13 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 12 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 12 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 11 |
About Petra De Block
Petra De Block is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Forestry and Food Science, having authored 62 papers that have together received 664 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Diversity and Evolution (51 papers), Plant and animal studies (29 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (19 papers), African Botany and Ecology Studies (9 papers), Botanical Research and Applications (8 papers), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (8 papers), Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (5 papers) and Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (38 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (470 citations), Forestry (57 citations), Molecular Biology (344 citations) and Plant Science (183 citations). Petra De Block has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Elmar Robbrecht, Steven Dessein, Erik Smets, Piero G. Delprete, Inge Groeninckx, W. Oehlert, Brecht Verstraete, Suzy Huysmans, Aaron P. Davis and Steven B. Janssens. Their work appears in journals such as Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, Taxon, Phytotaxa, Annals of Botany and PeerJ.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.