James Tosh
Impact in
- Horticulture top 2%
- Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Coffee research and impacts
Papers in
-
- Plant and animal studies 5
- Plant Diversity and Evolution 5
- Lichen and fungal ecology 1
-
- Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Aaron P. Davis (3 shared papers)Michael F. Fay (1 shared paper)Peter M. Hollingsworth (1 shared paper)B. J. Coppins (1 shared paper)Christopher J. Ellis (1 shared paper)Laura J. Kelly (1 shared paper)Rebecca Yahr (1 shared paper)Erik Smets (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society (3 papers)Annals of Botany (1 paper)Taxon (1 paper)New Phytologist (1 paper)Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomBelgiumNetherlands
In The Last Decade
James Tosh
10 papers receiving 423 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Horticulture 60
- Pharmacology 160
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 186
- Plant Science 214
- Forestry 20
Countries citing papers authored by James Tosh
This map shows the geographic impact of James Tosh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Tosh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Tosh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Tosh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Tosh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Tosh. The network helps show where James Tosh may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Tosh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 196 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 116 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 38 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 23 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 10 | Biogeography of Madagascan Rubiaceae: case studies from the Afro-Madagascan genus Tricalysia and the pantropical genus Ixora. | 2009 | 1 |
About James Tosh
James Tosh is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Pharmacology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 444 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (5 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (5 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (2 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (2 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (1 paper), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (1 paper), Coffee research and impacts (1 paper) and Ginger and Zingiberaceae research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (60 citations), Pharmacology (160 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (186 citations), Plant Science (214 citations) and Forestry (20 citations). James Tosh has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Aaron P. Davis, Michael F. Fay, Peter M. Hollingsworth, B. J. Coppins, Christopher J. Ellis, Laura J. Kelly, Rebecca Yahr, Erik Smets, Steven Dessein and Petra De Block. Their work appears in journals such as Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, Annals of Botany, Taxon, New Phytologist and Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.