Peter Schols

1.6k citations
25 papers · 723 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Schols

25 papers receiving 682 citations

Peers

Peter Schols
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 491
  • Plant Science 269
  • Molecular Biology 395
  • Food Science 102
  • Forestry 13
Replace Águedo Marrero with:
Águedo Marrero Spain
G. Clausing Germany
W. R. Philipson New Zealand
C. A. Naranjo Argentina
Hidetoshi Kato Japan
Lawrence Johnson Australia
Steven B. Janssens Belgium
Darin S. Penneys United States
Simon Uribe‐Convers United States
Byung‐Yun Sun South Korea
Peter Schols relative to Águedo Marrero Spain Águedo Marrero's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Águedo Marrero · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Schols

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Schols's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Schols with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Schols more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Schols

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Schols. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Schols. The network helps show where Peter Schols may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Schols, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Schols Line = papers co-authored together Peter Schols links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200592
2 200286
3 200679
4 200560
5 200352
6 200448
7 200342
8 200138
9 202032
10 200428
11 200527
12 200426
13 200216
14
Carnoy: analysis software for LM, SEM and TEM images
200116
15
Intervascular pit membranes with a torus in the wood of Ulmus (Ulmaceae) and related genera
200413
16 200412
17
Phylogenetic relationships in Nartheciaceae (Dioscoreales), with focus on pollen and orbicule morphology
200811
18 201511
19 200510
20 20007

About Peter Schols

Peter Schols is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Food Science and Cell Biology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 723 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Diversity and Evolution (15 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (6 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (4 papers), Potato Plant Research (4 papers), Plant Pathogens and Resistance (4 papers), Phytochemical Studies and Bioactivities (4 papers), Plant and animal studies (3 papers) and Botanical Research and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (491 citations), Plant Science (269 citations), Molecular Biology (395 citations), Food Science (102 citations) and Forestry (13 citations). Peter Schols has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Erik Smets, Suzy Huysmans, Paul Wilkin, Carol A. Furness, Catheleyne D’hondt, Vincent S. F. T. Merckx, Steven Dessein, Frederic Lens, Stefan Vinckier and Koen Geuten. Their work appears in journals such as Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, Systematic Botany, npj Genomic Medicine, The Botanical Review and American Journal of Botany.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact