Peter Teo
Impact in
- Linguistics and Language top 5%
- Multilingual Education and Policy
-
- Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Second Language Learning and Teaching
Papers in
-
- Socioeconomic Development in Asia 10
-
- Discourse Analysis in Language Studies 7
- Second Language Learning and Teaching 5
- Co-authors
- C.K. Lee (4 shared papers)Anyong Qing (1 shared paper)Stephen John Turner (1 shared paper)Zoltán Juhász (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Peter Teo
31 papers receiving 903 citations
Peter Teo's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Linguistics and Language 118
- Literature and Literary Theory 279
- Language and Linguistics 228
- Communication 144
- Education 346
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Teo
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Teo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Teo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Teo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Teo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Teo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Teo. The network helps show where Peter Teo may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Peter Teo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Racism in the News: A Critical Discourse Analysis of News Reporting in Two Australian Newspapers Hit paper breakdown → | 2000 | 391 |
| 2 | Teaching for the 21st century: A case for dialogic pedagogy Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 179 |
| 3 | 2016 | 53 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 41 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 37 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 30 | |
| 8 | The marketisation of higher education: A comparative case-study of two universities in Singapore | 2007 | 28 |
| 9 | 2019 | 27 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 27 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 23 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 20 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 19 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 16 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 14 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 8 |
About Peter Teo
Peter Teo is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Education, Linguistics and Language and Language and Linguistics, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Socioeconomic Development in Asia (10 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (7 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (6 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (5 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (5 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (5 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (4 papers) and Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (118 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (279 citations), Language and Linguistics (228 citations), Communication (144 citations) and Education (346 citations). Peter Teo has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, China and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include C.K. Lee, Anyong Qing, Stephen John Turner and Zoltán Juhász. Their work appears in journals such as Language and Education, Educational Philosophy and Theory, Teaching and Teacher Education, Discourse & Communication and Learning Culture and Social Interaction.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.