Peter Stonier

20 papers receiving 258 citations

Peers

Peter Stonier
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 20
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 98
  • Family Practice 6
  • Health Information Management 12
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 30
Replace Maisha Kelly Freeman with:
Maisha Kelly Freeman United States
Vikram Singh Rawat India
Ingrid Klingmann Germany
Tara Schmidlen United States
Frances Cartwright United States
Kaveeta P. Vasisht United States
Steven R. Arikian United States
Elisif Rytter Norway
Raluca Mihăescu Netherlands
Ehtesham Iqbal United Kingdom
Peter Stonier relative to Maisha Kelly Freeman United States Maisha Kelly Freeman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Maisha Kelly Freeman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Stonier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Stonier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Stonier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Stonier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Stonier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Stonier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Stonier. The network helps show where Peter Stonier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Stonier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Stonier Line = papers co-authored together Peter Stonier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199091
2 201845
3 201338
4 202119
5 202011
6 201811
7 201211
8 201610
9 200710
10 20017
11 20155
12 20194
13 20202
14 19922
15 19921
16 20011
17 20251
18 20001
19 20171
20 19961

About Peter Stonier

Peter Stonier is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Economics and Econometrics, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 275 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (10 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (6 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (4 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (3 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (2 papers) and Pharmaceutical studies and practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (20 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (98 citations), Family Practice (6 citations), Health Information Management (12 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (30 citations). Peter Stonier has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Rashmi R. Shah, Honorio Silva, Domenico Criscuolo, Fritz R. Bühler, Ingrid Klingmann, Dominique Dubois, J.P. Deslypère, H Klech, Boitumelo Semete‐Makokotlela and David Mukanga. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Pharmacology, Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine and The Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact