Peter Stonier

21 papers receiving 285 citations

Peers

Peter Stonier
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 16
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 93
  • Pharmacology 27
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 32
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 37
Replace Raluca Mihăescu with:
Raluca Mihăescu Netherlands
Maisha Kelly Freeman United States
Siobhán Gaynor Ireland
Krupali Desai United States
Pascal Paubel France
Helen G Lo United States
Daniel L. Tortorice United States
Elisif Rytter Norway
Kaveh Eslami Iran
Julie Eve Desmarais Canada
Peter Stonier relative to Raluca Mihăescu Netherlands Raluca Mihăescu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Raluca Mihăescu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Stonier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Stonier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Stonier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Stonier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Stonier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Stonier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Stonier. The network helps show where Peter Stonier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Stonier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Stonier Line = papers co-authored together Peter Stonier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990108
2 201849
3 201341
4 202121
5 201214
6 200712
7 201811
8 202011
9 201610
10 20018
11 20157
12 20196
13 20204
14 19922
15 19922
16 20001
17 19961
18 20011
19 20021
20
Careers with the Pharmaceutical Industry
20071

About Peter Stonier

Peter Stonier is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Pharmacology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 316 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (10 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (7 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (4 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (4 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (3 papers) and Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (16 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (93 citations), Pharmacology (27 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (32 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (37 citations). Peter Stonier has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Rashmi R. Shah, Honorio Silva, Domenico Criscuolo, Sándor Kerpel‐Fronius, Fritz Rolf Bühler, Ingrid Klingmann, Dominique J. Dubois, J.P. Deslypère, Greg Koski and Rudolf van Olden. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Pharmacology, Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine and The Lancet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact