Peter Stone

61 papers receiving 792 citations

Peers

Peter Stone
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Space and Planetary Science 19
  • General Decision Sciences 25
  • Political Science and International Relations 302
  • Management Science and Operations Research 109
  • Safety Research 66
Replace Jason Schultz with:
Jason Schultz United States
Lyria Bennett Moses Australia
Frédéric Adam Ireland
Jennifer Cobbe United Kingdom
Apurv Jain United States
Richards J. Heuer United States
Soumyo D. Moitra United States
P.B. de Laat Netherlands
Reuben Binns United Kingdom
Gillian Oliver Australia
Peter Stone relative to Jason Schultz United States Jason Schultz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.5×
Jason Schultz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Stone. The network helps show where Peter Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Stone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Stone Line = papers co-authored together Peter Stone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200881
2 201181
3 202275
4
The Luck of the Draw: The Role of Lotteries in Decision Making
201162
5 200753
6 200352
7 200951
8 200440
9
Autonomous Bidding Agents: Strategies and Lessons from the Trading Agent Competition (Intelligent Robotics and Autonomous Agents)
200735
10 201028
11 200825
12 201324
13 200823
14 201322
15 200520
16 200519
17 201318
18 201617
19 200914
20 201414

About Peter Stone

Peter Stone is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, Philosophy, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and General Decision Sciences, having authored 74 papers that have together received 917 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (13 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (6 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (5 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (4 papers), Game Theory and Applications (3 papers), Corporate Governance and Law (3 papers) and Free Will and Agency (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Space and Planetary Science (19 citations), General Decision Sciences (25 citations), Political Science and International Relations (302 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (109 citations) and Safety Research (66 citations). Peter Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include W. Bradley Knox, Patrick MacAlpine, Todd Hester, Michael P. Wellman, Amy Greenwald, Indira Carr, Michael L. Littman, János Csirik, Robert E. Schapire and David McAllester. Their work appears in journals such as Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Perspectives on Politics, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, Politics Philosophy & Economics and The Philosophical Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact