Peter Stone

52 papers receiving 612 citations

Peers

Peter Stone
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Space and Planetary Science 18
  • General Decision Sciences 22
  • Political Science and International Relations 223
  • Safety Research 54
  • Health Informatics 8
Replace Jason Schultz with:
Jason Schultz United States
Soumyo D. Moitra United States
Lyria Bennett Moses Australia
Richards J. Heuer United States
Peter Asaro United States
Martin C. Libicki United States
Ann Cavoukian Canada
Andreas Veglis Greece
Serge Gutwirth Belgium
Frédéric Adam Ireland
Peter Stone relative to Jason Schultz United States Jason Schultz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Jason Schultz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Stone. The network helps show where Peter Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Stone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Stone Line = papers co-authored together Peter Stone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200875
2 201161
3 202257
4
The Luck of the Draw: The Role of Lotteries in Decision Making
201146
5 200745
6 200945
7 200338
8 200436
9
Autonomous Bidding Agents: Strategies and Lessons from the Trading Agent Competition (Intelligent Robotics and Autonomous Agents)
200729
10 200822
11 200818
12 200518
13 200516
14 201014
15 201613
16 201312
17 200912
18 202010
19 200910
20 20148

About Peter Stone

Peter Stone is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy, Economics and Econometrics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 61 papers that have together received 687 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (10 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (5 papers), Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (4 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (4 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (3 papers) and Free Will and Agency (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Space and Planetary Science (18 citations), General Decision Sciences (22 citations), Political Science and International Relations (223 citations), Safety Research (54 citations) and Health Informatics (8 citations). Peter Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Nepal. Frequent co-authors include W. Bradley Knox, Amy Greenwald, Michael P. Wellman, Todd Hester, David McAllester, Robert E. Schapire, János Csirik, Michael L. Littman, Indira Carr and Greg Hager. Their work appears in journals such as Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, Perspectives on Politics, Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies and Contemporary Political Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact