Peter Stockham

597 citations
28 papers · 418 · h-index 12

Impact in

  • Toxicology top 0.5%
    • Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Spectroscopy top 10%
    • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
    • Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography

Papers in

Peter Stockham

26 papers receiving 406 citations

Peers

Peter Stockham
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Toxicology 257
  • Spectroscopy 102
  • Clinical Psychology 91
  • Analytical Chemistry 40
  • Emergency Medicine 26
Replace Giulia Stocchero with:
Giulia Stocchero Italy
Rasmus Telving Denmark
Marianna Tucci Italy
Michael Poetzsch Switzerland
Susanna Vogliardi Italy
Niclas Nikolai Stephanson Sweden
Sangwhan In South Korea
Marc Deveaux France
Robert E. Joseph United States
T. Ishida Japan
Peter Stockham relative to Giulia Stocchero Italy Giulia Stocchero's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Giulia Stocchero · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Stockham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Stockham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Stockham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Stockham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Stockham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Stockham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Stockham. The network helps show where Peter Stockham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Stockham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Stockham Line = papers co-authored together Peter Stockham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201984
2 201755
3 201850
4 201835
5 201225
6 201824
7 200315
8 201615
9 201714
10 201612
11 202112
12 202511
13 202110
14 20208
15 20248
16 20127
17 20216
18 20235
19 20204
20 20054

About Peter Stockham

Peter Stockham is a scholar working on Toxicology, Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy, Clinical Psychology and Emergency Medicine, having authored 28 papers that have together received 418 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (15 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (5 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (4 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (3 papers), Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (2 papers) and Poisoning and overdose treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (257 citations), Spectroscopy (102 citations), Clinical Psychology (91 citations), Analytical Chemistry (40 citations) and Emergency Medicine (26 citations). Peter Stockham has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Chris Kostakis, Timothy Scott, Roger W. Byard, Marie Mardal, Petur Weihe Dalsgaard, Christian Brinch Mollerup, Mette Findal Andreasen, Νikolaos S. Τhomaidis, Rasmus Telving and Kristían Línnet. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Drug Testing and Analysis, Journal of Forensic Sciences, Emergency Medicine Australasia and Legal Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact