Peter Speyer
Impact in
- Biological Psychiatry top 5%
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Migraine and Headache Studies
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
Papers in
-
- Health and Medical Studies 1
-
- Global Health Workforce Issues 1
- Co-authors
- Juan Lavista Ferres (2 shared papers)William Brinson Weeks (2 shared papers)Ji Eun Chang (2 shared papers)Ann Aerts (2 shared papers)J R Colón Pagán (1 shared paper)Allen Kim (1 shared paper)James N. Weinstein (1 shared paper)Katherine Leach‐Kemon (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Lancet (2 papers)BMC Proceedings (1 paper)PLOS Global Public Health (1 paper)BMJ Public Health (2 papers)NAM Perspectives (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandAustralia
In The Last Decade
Peter Speyer
5 papers receiving 5.2k citations
Peter Speyer's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 180
- Biological Psychiatry 139
- Psychiatry and Mental health 645
- Pharmacology 637
- Behavioral Neuroscience 73
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 328
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Speyer
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Speyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Speyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Speyer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Speyer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Speyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Speyer. The network helps show where Peter Speyer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Peter Speyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 5317 |
| 2 | 2023 | 65 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2026 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2025 | 0 |
About Peter Speyer
Peter Speyer is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Emergency Medical Services, Health, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 7 papers that have together received 5.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Maternal and Child Health (1 paper), Immune responses and vaccinations (1 paper), Health disparities and outcomes (1 paper), Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (1 paper), Health and Medical Studies (1 paper), Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (1 paper), Global Health Workforce Issues (1 paper) and Climate Change and Health Impacts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (139 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (645 citations), Pharmacology (637 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (73 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (328 citations). Peter Speyer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Juan Lavista Ferres, William Brinson Weeks, Ji Eun Chang, Ann Aerts, J R Colón Pagán, Allen Kim, James N. Weinstein, Katherine Leach‐Kemon, Theo Vos and Christopher J L Murray. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, BMC Proceedings, PLOS Global Public Health, BMJ Public Health and NAM Perspectives.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.