Peter Sheldon

63 papers receiving 465 citations

Peers

Peter Sheldon
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Public Administration 254
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 82
  • Political Science and International Relations 169
  • Strategy and Management 96
  • General Health Professions 131
Replace Jenny Harrow with:
Jenny Harrow United Kingdom
Dag Ingvar Jacobsen Norway
Anne‐marie Greene United Kingdom
John Fenwick United Kingdom
Diana Leat United Kingdom
Denis Saint‐Martin Canada
John Geary Ireland
Wolfgang Seibel Germany
Stefan Toepler United States
Norman Flynn United Kingdom
Peter Sheldon relative to Jenny Harrow United Kingdom Jenny Harrow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Jenny Harrow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Sheldon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Sheldon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Sheldon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Sheldon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Sheldon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Sheldon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Sheldon. The network helps show where Peter Sheldon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Sheldon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Sheldon Line = papers co-authored together Peter Sheldon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200544
2 201239
3 201435
4 201034
5 200228
6 200426
7 201620
8 201118
9 199416
10 199715
11 199913
12 200112
13 200611
14 201011
15 199610
16 199310
17 20189
18 19959
19 19999
20
Education, training and skills
20118

About Peter Sheldon

Peter Sheldon is a scholar working on Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management, Political Science and International Relations and General Health Professions, having authored 71 papers that have together received 532 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (42 papers), Australian History and Society (13 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (9 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (8 papers), Cooperative Studies and Economics (7 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (6 papers), International Labor and Employment Law (4 papers) and Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (254 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (82 citations), Political Science and International Relations (169 citations), Strategy and Management (96 citations) and General Health Professions (131 citations). Peter Sheldon has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Louise Thornthwaite, Yiqiong Li, Karin Sanders, David Morgan, Michael Quinlan, Diane van den Broek, Raymond Markey, Edoardo Della Torre, Jaehoon Rhee and Kathy L. Moser. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Industrial Relations, Labour History, The Economic and Labour Relations Review, The International Journal of Human Resource Management and Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact