Peter Scott
Impact in
- Public Administration top 5%
- Labor Movements and Unions
Papers in
- Education 29
- Online and Blended Learning 12
-
- Political and Economic history of UK and US 8
- Social Policy and Reform Studies 6
- Higher Education Governance and Development 6
- Co-authors
- Remus Pricopie (2 shared papers)Adrian Curaj (2 shared papers)Liviu Matei (2 shared papers)Jamil Salmi (2 shared papers)Michael J. Risk (2 shared papers)Peter Cressey (2 shared papers)Gwyn Rowley (1 shared paper)Brian Morton (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- New Technology Work and Employment (5 papers)Journal of Molluscan Studies (4 papers)Dissolution Technologies (3 papers)Marine Pollution Bulletin (2 papers)Work Employment and Society (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesHong Kong
In The Last Decade
Peter Scott
126 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
- Public Administration 84
- Computer Science Applications 111
- Oceanography 196
- Communication 110
- Education 327
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Scott. The network helps show where Peter Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 131 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 147 | |
| 2 | Social Software for Life-long Learning | 2007 | 116 |
| 3 | 2015 | 74 | |
| 4 | 1988 | 71 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 70 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 66 | |
| 7 | 1971 | 66 | |
| 8 | 1990 | 65 | |
| 9 | 1980 | 51 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 39 | |
| 11 | 1988 | 36 | |
| 12 | 1988 | 36 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 34 | |
| 14 | 2005 | 28 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 28 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 25 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 18 | 1988 | 22 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 21 | |
| 20 | Environment assisted fatigue | 1990 | 21 |
About Peter Scott
Peter Scott is a scholar working on Education, Political Science and International Relations, Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Public Administration, having authored 131 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (16 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (13 papers), Online and Blended Learning (12 papers), Open Education and E-Learning (8 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (8 papers), E-Learning and Knowledge Management (7 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (6 papers) and Higher Education Governance and Development (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (84 citations), Computer Science Applications (111 citations), Oceanography (196 citations), Communication (110 citations) and Education (327 citations). Peter Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Remus Pricopie, Adrian Curaj, Liviu Matei, Jamil Salmi, Michael J. Risk, Peter Cressey, Gwyn Rowley, Brian Morton, Fiona Brooks and Deborah Foster. Their work appears in journals such as New Technology Work and Employment, Journal of Molluscan Studies, Dissolution Technologies, Marine Pollution Bulletin and Work Employment and Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.