Peter Schwardmann

400 citations
22 papers · 197 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Schwardmann

22 papers receiving 191 citations

Peers

Peter Schwardmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • General Decision Sciences 52
  • Safety Research 68
  • Applied Psychology 21
  • Demography 19
  • Sociology and Political Science 69
Replace Joshua B. Miller with:
Joshua B. Miller Spain
Lisa Spantig Germany
Silvia Sonderegger United Kingdom
Leonie Gerhards Germany
Armenak Antinyan United Kingdom
Martin Schweinsberg Germany
Andreas Tutić Germany
Ronald Bosman Netherlands
Alexander K. Wagner Austria
Utteeyo Dasgupta United States
Peter Schwardmann relative to Joshua B. Miller Spain Joshua B. Miller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Joshua B. Miller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Schwardmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Schwardmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Schwardmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Schwardmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Schwardmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Schwardmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Schwardmann. The network helps show where Peter Schwardmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Peter Schwardmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Schwardmann Line = papers co-authored together Peter Schwardmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202236
2 202133
3 201918
4 201617
5 201915
6 202111
7 201910
8 20178
9 20227
10 20187
11 20246
12 20246
13 20195
14 20223
15 20213
16 20232
17 20242
18 20242
19 20202
20 20172

About Peter Schwardmann

Peter Schwardmann is a scholar working on Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science, Management Science and Operations Research, Economics and Econometrics and Accounting, having authored 22 papers that have together received 197 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (12 papers), Media Influence and Politics (4 papers), Game Theory and Applications (4 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (3 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (2 papers) and Environmental Education and Sustainability (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (52 citations), Safety Research (68 citations), Applied Psychology (21 citations), Demography (19 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (69 citations). Peter Schwardmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Joël J. van der Weele, Egon Tripodi, Guido Friebel, Paul Seabright, Jan B. Engelmann, Maël Lebreton, Taisuke Imai and Christopher Roth. Their work appears in journals such as American Economic Review, Journal of Industrial Economics, Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Review and American Economic Journal Microeconomics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact