Fernando Aguiar

33 papers receiving 258 citations

Peers

Fernando Aguiar
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • General Decision Sciences 37
  • Safety Research 134
  • Demography 58
  • Sociology and Political Science 121
  • Information Systems and Management 19
Replace Frédéric Schneider with:
Frédéric Schneider United Kingdom
Matthijs Poppe Netherlands
H.A.M. Wilke Netherlands
Fanmin Kong China
Thomas D. Gilovich United States
E. Glenn Dutcher United States
Namika Sagara United States
Petr Houdek Czechia
Mark Ottoni–Wilhelm United States
Deshani B. Ganegoda Australia
Fernando Aguiar relative to Frédéric Schneider United Kingdom Frédéric Schneider's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Frédéric Schneider · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fernando Aguiar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fernando Aguiar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fernando Aguiar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fernando Aguiar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fernando Aguiar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fernando Aguiar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fernando Aguiar. The network helps show where Fernando Aguiar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Fernando Aguiar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fernando Aguiar Line = papers co-authored together Fernando Aguiar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200873
2 200852
3 200422
4 201319
5 200919
6 201017
7 200213
8 20139
9 20038
10 20098
11 20225
12 20225
13 20075
14
La lógica de la cooperación
19904
15 20234
16 20074
17
Eutanasia y suicidio asistido: Un debate necesario
20094
18 20213
19 20003
20
Economía, sociedad y teoría de juegos
20082

About Fernando Aguiar

Fernando Aguiar is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research, Political Science and International Relations, Cognitive Neuroscience and General Social Sciences, having authored 39 papers that have together received 298 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (9 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (6 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (5 papers), Social Sciences and Policies (5 papers), Ethics and bioethics in healthcare (4 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (4 papers), Economic and Social Development (3 papers) and Game Theory and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (37 citations), Safety Research (134 citations), Demography (58 citations), Sociology and Political Science (121 citations) and Information Systems and Management (19 citations). Fernando Aguiar has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Sri Lanka and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Luis Miller, Pablo Brañas‐Garza, Andrés de Francisco, Natalia Jiménez, Ramón Cobo‐Reyes, Antonio Parravano, Marı́a Paz Espinosa, José Antonio Noguera, Pilar Aguilar and Ivar R. Hannikainen. Their work appears in journals such as Judgment and Decision Making, Journal of Conflict Resolution, European Journal of Social Psychology, Science and Engineering Ethics and European Journal of Sociology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact