Fernando Aguiar

519 citations
39 papers · 299 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Fernando Aguiar

33 papers receiving 259 citations

Peers

Fernando Aguiar
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • General Decision Sciences 37
  • Safety Research 134
  • Demography 57
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 52
  • Sociology and Political Science 121
Replace Frédéric Schneider with:
Frédéric Schneider United Kingdom
Matthijs Poppe Netherlands
H.A.M. Wilke Netherlands
Fanmin Kong United States
Thomas D. Gilovich United States
Namika Sagara United States
Petr Houdek Czechia
Deshani B. Ganegoda Australia
John Rijsman Netherlands
Margarita Leib Netherlands
Fernando Aguiar relative to Frédéric Schneider United Kingdom Frédéric Schneider's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Frédéric Schneider · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fernando Aguiar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fernando Aguiar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fernando Aguiar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fernando Aguiar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fernando Aguiar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fernando Aguiar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fernando Aguiar. The network helps show where Fernando Aguiar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Fernando Aguiar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fernando Aguiar Line = papers co-authored together Fernando Aguiar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200873
2 200852
3 200422
4 200919
5 201319
6 201017
7 200213
8 20139
9 20098
10 20038
11 20226
12 20075
13 20225
14
La lógica de la cooperación
19904
15 20234
16
Eutanasia y suicidio asistido: Un debate necesario
20094
17 20074
18 20213
19 20003
20 20072

About Fernando Aguiar

Fernando Aguiar is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research, Political Science and International Relations, Cognitive Neuroscience and General Social Sciences, having authored 39 papers that have together received 299 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (9 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (6 papers), Social Sciences and Policies (5 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (5 papers), Ethics and bioethics in healthcare (4 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (4 papers), Game Theory and Applications (3 papers) and Economic and Social Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (37 citations), Safety Research (134 citations), Demography (57 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (52 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (121 citations). Fernando Aguiar has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Sri Lanka and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Luis Miller, Pablo Brañas‐Garza, Andrés de Francisco, Natalia Jiménez, Ramón Cobo‐Reyes, Marı́a Paz Espinosa, Antonio Parravano, Pilar Aguilar, José Antonio Noguera and Ivar R. Hannikainen. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Judgment and Decision Making, PLoS ONE, American Behavioral Scientist and European Journal of Sociology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact