Peter Schaber

28 papers receiving 134 citations

Peers

Peter Schaber
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Philosophy 31
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 28
  • Small Animals 15
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 33
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 11
Replace Jennifer Welchman with:
Jennifer Welchman Canada
Angelika Krebs Switzerland
Visa Kurki Finland
Gregory E. Kaebnick United States
Monika Kurath Switzerland
Wojciech Małecki Poland
T. J. Kasperbauer United States
Richard D. Ryder United Kingdom
Eva Meijer Netherlands
Hendrik van den Belt Netherlands
Peter Schaber relative to Jennifer Welchman Canada Jennifer Welchman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Jennifer Welchman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Schaber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Schaber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Schaber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Schaber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Schaber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Schaber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Schaber. The network helps show where Peter Schaber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Peter Schaber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Schaber Line = papers co-authored together Peter Schaber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201832
2 200026
3 199919
4 200416
5 200014
6 20056
7 19996
8 20116
9 20106
10 20214
11 20193
12 19993
13
Menschenwürde vs. Würde der Kreatur : Begriffsbestimmung, Gentechnik, Ethikkommissionen
19982
14
Weltarmut und Ethik
20092
15 20122
16 20162
17 20171
18 20171
19 20041
20 19941

About Peter Schaber

Peter Schaber is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, General Health Professions and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 34 papers that have together received 163 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient Dignity and Privacy (9 papers), Ethics in medical practice (7 papers), Medical and Health Sciences Research (7 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (5 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers), Criminal Law and Policy (4 papers), Free Will and Agency (3 papers) and Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (31 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (28 citations), Small Animals (15 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (33 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (11 citations). Peter Schaber has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Hungary and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Florian Altermatt, Kentaro K. Shimizu, Samuel Abiven, Anna Deplazes‐Zemp, Gabriela Schaepman‐Strub, Michael E. Schaepman, Bernhard Schmid, Michael Schefczyk, Mark Peacock and Holger Baumann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, Environmental Values, Analyse & Kritik, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice and Ratio.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact