Environmental Values

1.3k papers and 15.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Environmental Values in the last decades have received a total of 15.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Environmental Values usually cover Sociology and Political Science (516 papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (434 papers) and Global and Planetary Change (322 papers) specifically the topics of Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (431 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (266 papers) and Climate Change and Geoengineering (169 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Environmental Values are Clive L. Spash, Stephen M. Gardiner, Wilfred Beckerman, Andrew Dobson, Sheila Jasanoff, Allen Carlson, Brigitte Nerlich, Barbara Muraca, Bryan G. Norton and Martin Drenthen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Environmental Values

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Environmental Values. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Environmental Values.

Countries where authors publish in Environmental Values

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Environmental Values. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Environmental Values with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Environmental Values more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025