Peter Phillips

716 citations
44 papers · 431 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Phillips

41 papers receiving 403 citations

Peers

Peter Phillips
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • General Decision Sciences 44
  • Family Practice 36
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 134
  • Health Informatics 8
  • Human-Computer Interaction 22
Replace Yen Wang with:
Yen Wang United States
Eugenio Alberdi United Kingdom
Priscila G. Brust‐Renck Brazil
Paul Tierney United Kingdom
Susanne Gaube Germany
Thomas Dratsch Germany
Gary M. Velan Australia
Sophie van Baalen Netherlands
Eugene Tseytlin United States
Michael Müller Germany
Peter Phillips relative to Yen Wang United States Yen Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×
Yen Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Phillips

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Phillips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Phillips

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Phillips. The network helps show where Peter Phillips may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Phillips, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Phillips Line = papers co-authored together Peter Phillips links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200786
2 200662
3 201449
4 199542
5 201421
6 201319
7 201515
8 200512
9 201111
10 201710
11 20117
12 20166
13 20236
14 20036
15 19996
16 20056
17
Eye-Movements and Reasoning: Evidence for Relevance Effects and Rationalisation Processes in Deontic Selection Tasks.
20054
18 19994
19 20164
20 20224

About Peter Phillips

Peter Phillips is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Sociology and Political Science, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Human-Computer Interaction and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 44 papers that have together received 431 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiology practices and education (9 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (6 papers), Multimedia Communication and Technology (4 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (3 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (3 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (3 papers), Wikis in Education and Collaboration (2 papers) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (44 citations), Family Practice (36 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (134 citations), Health Informatics (8 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (22 citations). Peter Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include David Manning, Chris James, Linden J. Ball, Mark F. McEntee, Michael G. Evanoff, Patrick Brennan, William T. O’Connor, Alastair G. Gale, Steve Halligan and Susan Mallett. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Radiology, Radiology, Research in Learning Technology, American Journal of Roentgenology and European Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact