Lisa Booth

20 papers receiving 218 citations

Peers

Lisa Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 16
  • Health Information Management 34
  • Family Practice 13
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 112
  • Research and Theory 3
Replace Benjamin H. Slovis with:
Benjamin H. Slovis United States
Davoren Chick United States
Daniel B. Evans United States
Sophia Bee Leng Ang Singapore
Judith Clare Australia
David G. Metro United States
Michael Bennick United States
Craig M. Campbell Canada
Jason N. Batten United States
Ben Thomas United Kingdom
Lisa Booth relative to Benjamin H. Slovis United States Benjamin H. Slovis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Benjamin H. Slovis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lisa Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa Booth. The network helps show where Lisa Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Lisa Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lisa Booth Line = papers co-authored together Lisa Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200728
2 200526
3 201522
4 202115
5 201515
6 201414
7 201514
8 201713
9 201712
10 201212
11 202111
12 201711
13 201710
14 20227
15 20147
16 20236
17 20184
18 20063
19 20153
20 20181

About Lisa Booth

Lisa Booth is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Psychiatry and Mental health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 234 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiology practices and education (8 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (7 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (5 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (4 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (4 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (2 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (2 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (16 citations), Health Information Management (34 citations), Family Practice (13 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (112 citations) and Research and Theory (3 citations). Lisa Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Norway. Frequent co-authors include David Manning, Deborah Henderson, William K. Gray, Anita Woods, Aidín McKinney, Christian P Subbe, Tracey Bucknall, Mandy Odell, Peter Phillips and Lucy Bray. Their work appears in journals such as Radiography, Insights into Imaging, Emergency Medicine Journal, Safety Science and Dementia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact