Peter Meredith

5.5k citations
193 papers · 3.9k · h-index 35

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Meredith

182 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers

Peter Meredith
Comparison fields: 5 of 174
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.4k
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 616
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 645
  • Pharmacology 283
  • Analytical Chemistry 284
Replace J Pikkarainen with:
J Pikkarainen Finland
James J. DiNicolantonio United States
Kristiina Nyyssönen Finland
Claudio Ceconi Italy
A. Gaddi Italy
Steen Stender Denmark
Andrea Mezzetti Italy
Ram B. Singh India
D. J. Betteridge United Kingdom
Marcus M. Reidenberg United States
Peter Meredith relative to J Pikkarainen Finland J Pikkarainen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
J Pikkarainen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Meredith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Meredith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Meredith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Meredith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Meredith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Meredith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Meredith. The network helps show where Peter Meredith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Meredith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Meredith Line = papers co-authored together Peter Meredith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 193 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998462
2 2003145
3 199885
4 201374
5 197869
6 198168
7 198468
8 198866
9 197763
10 198759
11 199358
12 198455
13 198554
14 199053
15 199851
16 199651
17 197851
18 199548
19 197748
20 198747

About Peter Meredith

Peter Meredith is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Nutrition and Dietetics, Molecular Biology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 193 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (44 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (25 papers), Food composition and properties (18 papers), Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (15 papers), Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (13 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (12 papers), Porphyrin Metabolism and Disorders (12 papers) and Heart Failure Treatment and Management (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.4k citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (616 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (645 citations), Pharmacology (283 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (284 citations). Peter Meredith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Henry L. Elliott, John L. Reid, Michael Moore, A. Goldberg, Gordon T. McInnes, Lilian S. Murray, David Hole, Anthony F. Lever, James W.K. Robertson and C. Gillis. Their work appears in journals such as Starch - Stärke, Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, Journal of Hypertension, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics and Blood Pressure.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact