Peter Meredith

5.5k citations
203 papers · 4.3k · h-index 37

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Meredith

183 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Peers

Peter Meredith
Comparison fields: 5 of 152
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.5k
  • Classics 312
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 404
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 422
  • Pharmacology 260
Replace Ramón Gomis with:
Ramón Gomis Spain
Henry L. Elliott United Kingdom
Steen Stender Denmark
Tatu A. Miettinen Finland
Matti J. Tikkanen Finland
María José Tormo Spain
Sander J. Robins United States
Guillermo T. Sáez Spain
John J. Lima United States
Garrett A. FitzGerald United States
Peter Meredith relative to Ramón Gomis Spain Ramón Gomis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.1×
Ramón Gomis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Meredith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Meredith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Meredith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Meredith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Meredith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Meredith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Meredith. The network helps show where Peter Meredith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Meredith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Meredith Line = papers co-authored together Peter Meredith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 203 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998493
2 2003156
3 201388
4 199886
5 198179
6 199077
7 197876
8 198472
9 199669
10 198867
11 198760
12 199358
13 198557
14 199857
15
The Staging of religious drama in Europe in the later Middle Ages : texts and documents in English translation
198356
16 198456
17 198055
18 199254
19 197753
20 197852

About Peter Meredith

Peter Meredith is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Classics, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Nutrition and Dietetics and Pharmacology, having authored 203 papers that have together received 4.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (82 papers), Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (29 papers), Medieval Literature and History (26 papers), Food composition and properties (25 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (17 papers), Renin-Angiotensin System Studies (14 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (7 papers) and Porphyrin Metabolism and Disorders (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.5k citations), Classics (312 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (404 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (422 citations) and Pharmacology (260 citations). Peter Meredith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Henry L. Elliott, John L. Reid, Michael R. Moore, A. Goldberg, Gordon T. McInnes, Richard Donnelly, Lilian S. Murray, David J. Hole, Anthony F. Lever and Charles R Gillis. Their work appears in journals such as Starch - Stärke, Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, Blood Pressure, Journal of Hypertension and Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact