Peter Happé
Impact in
Papers in
-
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 6
- Joseph Conrad and Literature 4
- Historical and Literary Analyses 4
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies 4
- Classics 12
- Medieval Literature and History 9
- Renaissance Literature and Culture 7
- Co-authors
- Peter Meredith (1 shared paper)Clifford Davidson (1 shared paper)John Bale (1 shared paper)Andrew Charles Breeze (1 shared paper)John N. King (1 shared paper)John Henry Jowett (1 shared paper)H. R. Woudhuysen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Comparative drama (4 papers)Studies in English Literature 1500-1900 (3 papers)Notes and Queries (2 papers)Ben Jonson Journal (2 papers)English Journal of the English Association (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Peter Happé
19 papers receiving 46 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
- Classics 137
- History 123
- Religious studies 22
- Literature and Literary Theory 47
- Museology 8
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Happé
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Happé's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Happé with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Happé more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Happé
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Happé. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Happé. The network helps show where Peter Happé may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Peter Happé, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1990 | 78 | |
| 2 | 1987 | 52 | |
| 3 | The complete plays of John Bale | 1985 | 26 |
| 4 | 2009 | 9 | |
| 5 | The plays of John Heywood | 1991 | 9 |
| 6 | 2002 | 5 | |
| 7 | Four morality plays | 1979 | 4 |
| 8 | The Vocacyon of Johan Bale | 1990 | 4 |
| 9 | 2001 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 12 | The worlde and the chylde | 1999 | 2 |
| 13 | 1998 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1987 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1965 | 2 | |
| 17 | English Mystery Plays: A Selection | 1975 | 2 |
| 18 | Spectacle in Bale and Heywood | 1994 | 1 |
| 19 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 1 |
About Peter Happé
Peter Happé is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Classics, History, Anthropology and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 48 papers that have together received 216 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (9 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (8 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (7 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (6 papers), Joseph Conrad and Literature (4 papers), Historical and Literary Analyses (4 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (4 papers) and Theatre and Performance Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (137 citations), History (123 citations), Religious studies (22 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (47 citations) and Museology (8 citations). Peter Happé has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter Meredith, Clifford Davidson, John Bale, Andrew Charles Breeze, John N. King, John Henry Jowett and H. R. Woudhuysen. Their work appears in journals such as Comparative drama, Studies in English Literature 1500-1900, Notes and Queries, Ben Jonson Journal and English Journal of the English Association.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.