Peter M. Kragh
Impact in
-
- Reproductive Biology and Fertility
- Genetics top 5%
- Animal Genetics and Reproduction
- Virus-based gene therapy research
Papers in
-
- Reproductive Biology and Fertility 30
- Genetics 24
- Animal Genetics and Reproduction 24
- Co-authors
- Gábor Vajta (37 shared papers)Lars Bolund (27 shared papers)Stig Purup (23 shared papers)Yutao Du (21 shared papers)Henrik Callesen (23 shared papers)Mette H. Schmidt (18 shared papers)Huanming Yang (16 shared papers)Ingrid Brück Bøgh (9 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Peter M. Kragh
43 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 709
- Genetics 598
- Reproductive Medicine 172
- Molecular Biology 951
- Surgery 212
Countries citing papers authored by Peter M. Kragh
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter M. Kragh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter M. Kragh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter M. Kragh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter M. Kragh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter M. Kragh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter M. Kragh. The network helps show where Peter M. Kragh may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter M. Kragh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 173 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 154 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 128 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 94 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 59 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 55 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 53 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 52 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 49 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 49 | |
| 11 | Comparison of efficiency of open pulled straw (OPS) and Cryotop vitrification for cryopreservation of in vitro matured pig oocytes. | 2009 | 41 |
| 12 | 2012 | 40 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 40 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 38 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 34 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 34 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 32 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 31 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 31 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 22 |
About Peter M. Kragh
Peter M. Kragh is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (30 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (24 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (20 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (9 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (7 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (6 papers), Renal and related cancers (6 papers) and Xenotransplantation and immune response (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (709 citations), Genetics (598 citations), Reproductive Medicine (172 citations), Molecular Biology (951 citations) and Surgery (212 citations). Peter M. Kragh has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, China and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Gábor Vajta, Lars Bolund, Stig Purup, Yutao Du, Henrik Callesen, Mette H. Schmidt, Huanming Yang, Ingrid Brück Bøgh, Lin Lin and Jiong Li. Their work appears in journals such as Reproduction Fertility and Development, Theriogenology, Transgenic Research, Cellular Reprogramming and Cryobiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.