Peter Knapp

7.8k citations
154 papers · 5.1k · h-index 42

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Knapp

148 papers receiving 4.9k citations

Peers

Peter Knapp
Comparison fields: 5 of 176
  • Rehabilitation 905
  • Family Practice 192
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 280
  • Applied Psychology 263
  • Medical Terminology 11
Replace Laurence G. Branch with:
Laurence G. Branch United States
Michael E. Hyland United Kingdom
Scott R. Beach United States
Levente Kriston Germany
Carla Bann United States
Caroline R. Richardson United States
Curtis Florence United States
Joy Adamson United Kingdom
Melanie Luppa Germany
Claudia Cooper United Kingdom
Peter Knapp relative to Laurence G. Branch United States Laurence G. Branch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Laurence G. Branch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Knapp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Knapp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Knapp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Knapp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Knapp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Knapp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Knapp. The network helps show where Peter Knapp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Knapp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Knapp Line = papers co-authored together Peter Knapp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 154 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012347
2 2001339
3 2007235
4 2012222
5 2014139
6 2011130
7 2004126
8 2007114
9 2020112
10 2004112
11 2003110
12 2020105
13 201795
14 200393
15 199289
16 200684
17 199873
18 200367
19 200564
20 201463

About Peter Knapp

Peter Knapp is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Rehabilitation, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology, having authored 154 papers that have together received 5.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (14 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (11 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (10 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (9 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (4 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (4 papers) and Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (905 citations), Family Practice (192 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (280 citations), Applied Psychology (263 citations) and Medical Terminology (11 citations). Peter Knapp has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include David K. Raynor, Allan House, Andy Vail, Dianne C. Berry, John Bamford, Felicity Astin, Jenni Murray, Cassandra Burton, John Holmes and Donald Nicolson. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, Patient Education and Counseling, Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact