Jane Smith

28 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Jane Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Rehabilitation 338
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 118
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 98
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 63
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 112
Replace Brent Hodgkinson with:
Brent Hodgkinson Australia
Maggie Killington Australia
Charles Austin United States
Barbara Liu Canada
Daniel Habtemariam United States
Henry J. Woodford United Kingdom
Marie‐Josée Sirois Canada
Romke van Balen Netherlands
Monique A. A. Caljouw Netherlands
Carl Hanger New Zealand
Jane Smith relative to Brent Hodgkinson Australia Brent Hodgkinson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.6×
Brent Hodgkinson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Smith. The network helps show where Jane Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Smith Line = papers co-authored together Jane Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012217
2 2013158
3 200988
4 200477
5 200971
6 200565
7 201360
8 200158
9 201957
10 200935
11 201927
12 200527
13 201521
14 197721
15 201214
16 200113
17 201413
18 202010
19 202010
20 20188

About Jane Smith

Jane Smith is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Rehabilitation, Epidemiology, General Health Professions and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (9 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (8 papers), Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (2 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (2 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (2 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (2 papers) and Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (338 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (118 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (98 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (63 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (112 citations). Jane Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include John Young, Anne Förster, Lesley Brown, Allan House, John Wright, Peter Knapp, John Green, Eileen Burns, Jo Hardy and Sharon K. Inouye. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Rehabilitation, Age and Ageing, Animal Production Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact