Peter Klimek

112 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peter Klimek's Hit Papers

Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions 2020 · 897 citations
8970+2+4Years since publication250500750

Peers

Peter Klimek
Comparison fields: 5 of 199
  • Modeling and Simulation 689
  • Economics and Econometrics 575
  • Internal Medicine 77
  • Health 169
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 202
Replace Luca Rossi with:
Luca Rossi Italy
Odd O. Aalen Norway
Ørnulf Borgan Norway
A. James O’Malley United States
Wendy W. Chapman United States
Maurizio Vanelli Italy
Shahadat Uddin Australia
Håkon K. Gjessing Norway
Niamh O’Neill United Kingdom
Mehdi Khan United Kingdom
Peter Klimek relative to Luca Rossi Italy Luca Rossi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Luca Rossi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Klimek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Klimek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Klimek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Klimek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Klimek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Klimek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Klimek. The network helps show where Peter Klimek may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Klimek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Klimek Line = papers co-authored together Peter Klimek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 123 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions
Hit paper breakdown →
2020897
2 2018193
3 201294
4 202093
5 202183
6 202173
7 201372
8 202067
9 201961
10 201558
11 201458
12 202057
13 202346
14 201544
15 201944
16 202341
17 201238
18 201537
19 202037
20 201831

About Peter Klimek

Peter Klimek is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Surgery, having authored 123 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 epidemiological studies (12 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (10 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (10 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (9 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (6 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (6 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (6 papers) and Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (689 citations), Economics and Econometrics (575 citations), Internal Medicine (77 citations), Health (169 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (202 citations). Peter Klimek has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Thurner, Rudolf Hanel, Elma Dervić, Nils Haug, Vittorio Loreto, Lukas Geyrhofer, Alessandro Londei, Amélie Desvars-Larrive, Beate Pinior and Alexandra Kautzky‐Willer. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Personalized Medicine and Nature Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact