Peter J. Smith

14.2k citations
429 papers · 12.0k · h-index 57

Impact in

Papers in

Peter J. Smith

414 papers receiving 11.2k citations

Peers

Peter J. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 209
  • Sensory Systems 533
  • Organic Chemistry 2.3k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.3k
  • Inorganic Chemistry 1.0k
  • Aging 120
Replace Jonathan S. Stamler with:
Jonathan S. Stamler United States
Jean Cadet France
Thierry Douki France
Hiroshi Kato Japan
John W. Eaton United States
Hong Li China
Qun Liu China
George Sachs United States
Robert C. Hider United Kingdom
Takashi Itoh Japan
Peter J. Smith relative to Jonathan S. Stamler United States Jonathan S. Stamler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Jonathan S. Stamler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Smith. The network helps show where Peter J. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter J. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter J. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Peter J. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 429 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996231
2 2011230
3 2000216
4 2002202
5 2000200
6 1998199
7 2008196
8 1980180
9 2005173
10 1978164
11 1987153
12 1984146
13 1999144
14 2008141
15 1974135
16 2002128
17 1972127
18 1982126
19 1998122
20 1984114

About Peter J. Smith

Peter J. Smith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Inorganic Chemistry and Materials Chemistry, having authored 429 papers that have together received 12.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organometallic Compounds Synthesis and Characterization (65 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (39 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (29 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (20 papers), Crystal structures of chemical compounds (19 papers), Thermal and Kinetic Analysis (18 papers), Cephalopods and Marine Biology (15 papers) and Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (533 citations), Organic Chemistry (2.3k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.3k citations), Inorganic Chemistry (1.0k citations) and Aging (120 citations). Peter J. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include James R. Trimarchi, D. Marshall Porterfield, Alwyn G. Davies, Dennis Brown, Sylvie Breton, Richard H. Sanger, Alan J. Crowe, Katherine Hammar, David L. Keefe and Les Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, Biological Bulletin, Canadian Journal of Chemistry, Journal of Experimental Biology and Inorganica Chimica Acta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact