Peter J. Smith

170 papers receiving 5.9k citations

Peers

Peter J. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Bioengineering 258
  • Electrochemistry 190
  • Sensory Systems 285
  • Reproductive Medicine 379
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 579
Replace Lionel F. Jaffe with:
Lionel F. Jaffe United States
Walter F. Boron United States
J. Michael McCaffery United States
John Orlowski Canada
Kotaro Oka Japan
Richard Darwin Keynes United Kingdom
Minoru Tanaka Japan
Koji Sato Japan
Ramón Latorre Chile
Ting Li China
Peter J. Smith relative to Lionel F. Jaffe United States Lionel F. Jaffe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.1×
Lionel F. Jaffe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Smith. The network helps show where Peter J. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter J. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter J. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Peter J. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 171 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011242
2 1996230
3 2000217
4 2002204
5 1998203
6 2008196
7 2005176
8 1999146
9 2008144
10 1999103
11 200893
12 200592
13 200186
14 199984
15 200584
16 201983
17 199781
18 200381
19 201181
20 201379

About Peter J. Smith

Peter J. Smith is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Bioengineering, Molecular Biology, Sensory Systems and Electrochemistry, having authored 171 papers that have together received 6.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (25 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (18 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (17 papers), ATP Synthase and ATPases Research (14 papers), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (14 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (13 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (11 papers) and Ion Channels and Receptors (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Bioengineering (258 citations), Electrochemistry (190 citations), Sensory Systems (285 citations), Reproductive Medicine (379 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (579 citations). Peter J. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include James R. Trimarchi, David Marshall Porterfield, Dennis J. Brown, Sylvie Breton, Richard H. Sanger, David Lawrence Keefe, Katherine M. Hammar, Mark A. Messerli, Elizabeth A. Howes and Leon P. Collis. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Bulletin, Journal of Experimental Biology, Cell and Tissue Research, Biophysical Journal and American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact