Diane E. Heck

132 papers receiving 4.7k citations

Peers

Diane E. Heck
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Pharmacology 519
  • Biochemistry 429
  • Dermatology 386
  • Physiology 654
  • Biochemistry 143
Replace Takafumi Suzuki with:
Takafumi Suzuki Japan
Masayasu Inoue Japan
Aldo Tomasi Italy
Robert J. Langenbach United States
Seppo O. K. Auriola Finland
Aglaia Pappa Greece
Xin Wang China
Keiko Taguchi Japan
José Remacle Belgium
Michael A. Trush United States
Diane E. Heck relative to Takafumi Suzuki Japan Takafumi Suzuki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Takafumi Suzuki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Diane E. Heck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diane E. Heck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diane E. Heck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diane E. Heck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diane E. Heck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diane E. Heck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diane E. Heck. The network helps show where Diane E. Heck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Diane E. Heck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Diane E. Heck Line = papers co-authored together Diane E. Heck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 137 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003318
2 1992259
3 1998228
4 2009192
5 1994166
6 2001151
7 2010143
8 2005133
9 2010132
10 2002127
11 2010115
12 2003112
13 1995109
14 2010105
15 1992103
16 1994100
17 199594
18 200793
19 201181
20 200763

About Diane E. Heck

Diane E. Heck is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Pharmacology, Physiology, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, having authored 137 papers that have together received 4.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (27 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (26 papers), Redox biology and oxidative stress (19 papers), Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (16 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (10 papers), Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress (10 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (9 papers) and Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (519 citations), Biochemistry (429 citations), Dermatology (386 citations), Physiology (654 citations) and Biochemistry (143 citations). Diane E. Heck has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey D. Laskin, Debra L. Laskin, Carol R. Gardner, Anna M. Vetrano, Thomas M. Mariano, Vladimir M. Mishin, Joshua P. Gray, Barry I. Weinberger, Donald R. Gerecke and Patrick J. Sinko. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Experimental and Molecular Pathology, Chemical Research in Toxicology, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Biochemical Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact