Peter Harnetty

610 citations
36 papers · 268 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Harnetty

29 papers receiving 198 citations

Peers

Peter Harnetty
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Anthropology 59
  • Economics and Econometrics 98
  • Political Science and International Relations 84
  • Sociology and Political Science 127
  • Demography 25
Replace Clive Dewey with:
Clive Dewey United Kingdom
Mark Naidis United States
Daniel Waley United Kingdom
Bruce H. Mann United States
William W. Freehling United States
W. H. Morris‐Jones United Kingdom
John R. McLane United States
David West Rudner United States
Robert Hartwell United States
Jerome Blum United States
Peter Harnetty relative to Clive Dewey United Kingdom Clive Dewey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Clive Dewey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Harnetty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Harnetty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Harnetty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Harnetty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Harnetty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Harnetty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Harnetty. The network helps show where Peter Harnetty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Peter Harnetty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Harnetty Line = papers co-authored together Peter Harnetty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200031
2 198030
3 199427
4 199121
5 197221
6 197519
7 198319
8 198314
9 199013
10 197111
11 19897
12 19667
13 19947
14 19695
15 19625
16 19733
17 19983
18 20013
19 19633
20 19873

About Peter Harnetty

Peter Harnetty is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Anthropology, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 36 papers that have together received 268 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include South Asian Studies and Conflicts (5 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (5 papers), Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies (5 papers), Agricultural Economics and Practices (4 papers), Social and Economic Development in India (4 papers), African history and culture studies (3 papers), Indian Economic and Social Development (3 papers) and Australian History and Society (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (59 citations), Economics and Econometrics (98 citations), Political Science and International Relations (84 citations), Sociology and Political Science (127 citations) and Demography (25 citations). Peter Harnetty has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include B. R. Tomlinson, W. J. Macpherson, Peter Cain, A. G. Hopkins and Holden Furber. Their work appears in journals such as Pacific Affairs, The American Historical Review, The Economic History Review, Modern Asian Studies and The Indian Economic & Social History Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact