Mark Naidis

765 citations
38 papers · 434 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Naidis

32 papers receiving 265 citations

Peers

Mark Naidis
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Anthropology 109
  • Political Science and International Relations 162
  • Sociology and Political Science 247
  • Philosophy 43
  • History 37
Replace Charles S. Blackton with:
Charles S. Blackton United States
Kenneth Ballhatchet United Kingdom
Betty Fladeland United States
Edward Countryman United States
B. D. Graham United Kingdom
Christine Bolt United Kingdom
Granville Austin United States
Maxime Rodinson
William W. Freehling United States
Eugene F. Irschick United States
Mark Naidis relative to Charles S. Blackton United States Charles S. Blackton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Charles S. Blackton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Naidis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Naidis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Naidis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Naidis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Naidis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Naidis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Naidis. The network helps show where Mark Naidis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Mark Naidis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Naidis Line = papers co-authored together Mark Naidis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196863
2 196249
3 196548
4 199042
5 197236
6 199129
7 198826
8 196815
9 199013
10 197213
11 19669
12 19749
13 19708
14 19818
15 19518
16 19868
17 19827
18 19786
19 19664
20 19654

About Mark Naidis

Mark Naidis is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Philosophy and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 38 papers that have together received 434 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include South Asian Studies and Conflicts (8 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (7 papers), Indian History and Philosophy (4 papers), Indian Economic and Social Development (4 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (3 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (2 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (2 papers) and Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (109 citations), Political Science and International Relations (162 citations), Sociology and Political Science (247 citations), Philosophy (43 citations) and History (37 citations). Mark Naidis has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Francis G. Hutchins, Thomas R. Metcalf, Raymond Evans, David Hamer, Hugh Tinker, Charles F. Reynolds, Helen Fein, David G. Mandelbaum, Veena Talwar Oldenburg and Gary R. Hess. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Journal of Asian Studies, Pacific Affairs, The Journal of Higher Education and The Journal of Economic History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact