Clive Dewey

736 citations
34 papers · 454 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Clive Dewey

29 papers receiving 315 citations

Peers

Clive Dewey
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Anthropology 153
  • Political Science and International Relations 149
  • History 52
  • Sociology and Political Science 203
  • Economics and Econometrics 105
Replace Rajat Kanta Ray with:
Rajat Kanta Ray India
Peter Harnetty Canada
Friedrich Katz United States
John R. McLane United States
Daniel Waley United Kingdom
Blair B. Kling United States
G. V. Scammell United States
Jerome Blum United States
Lester D. Langley United States
Ritu Birla Canada
Clive Dewey relative to Rajat Kanta Ray India Rajat Kanta Ray's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Rajat Kanta Ray · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clive Dewey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clive Dewey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clive Dewey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clive Dewey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clive Dewey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clive Dewey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clive Dewey. The network helps show where Clive Dewey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Clive Dewey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clive Dewey Line = papers co-authored together Clive Dewey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197863
2 197242
3 198538
4 197934
5 198134
6 199532
7 197432
8 198329
9 197428
10 197923
11 197719
12 198210
13 19799
14 19918
15 19928
16 19907
17 19786
18
The mind of the Indian civil service
19965
19 19914
20 19844

About Clive Dewey

Clive Dewey is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, having authored 34 papers that have together received 454 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (7 papers), African history and culture studies (6 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (6 papers), Indian Economic and Social Development (4 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (4 papers), South Asian Studies and Conflicts (4 papers), Social and Economic Development in India (3 papers) and Agricultural risk and resilience (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (153 citations), Political Science and International Relations (149 citations), History (52 citations), Sociology and Political Science (203 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (105 citations). Clive Dewey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include A. G. Hopkins, C. A. Bayly, Edward Ingram, Cyril Ehrlich, K. N. Chaudhuri, David Washbrook, Jan Breman, Patrick Manning, Alan Heston and John Singleton. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic History Review, The American Historical Review, Modern Asian Studies, The International Journal of the History of Sport and The Journal of Interdisciplinary History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact