Clive Dewey

740 citations
33 papers · 383 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Clive Dewey

28 papers receiving 283 citations

Peers

Clive Dewey
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Anthropology 120
  • Political Science and International Relations 124
  • Sociology and Political Science 187
  • History 40
  • Economics and Econometrics 97
Replace Peter Harnetty with:
Peter Harnetty Canada
Ian J. Kerr Canada
Rajat Kanta Ray India
Blair B. Kling United States
Jerome Blum United States
Ruth First
Lester D. Langley United States
Ritu Birla Canada
Daniel Waley United Kingdom
John R. McLane United States
Clive Dewey relative to Peter Harnetty Canada Peter Harnetty's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Peter Harnetty · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clive Dewey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clive Dewey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clive Dewey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clive Dewey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clive Dewey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clive Dewey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clive Dewey. The network helps show where Clive Dewey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Clive Dewey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clive Dewey Line = papers co-authored together Clive Dewey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197852
2 197238
3 198535
4 198132
5 199529
6 197928
7 198326
8 197423
9 197422
10 197719
11 197918
12 198210
13 19798
14 19927
15 19905
16 19785
17
The mind of the Indian civil service
19964
18 19924
19 19844
20 20192

About Clive Dewey

Clive Dewey is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, having authored 33 papers that have together received 383 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include African history and culture studies (7 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (7 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (6 papers), Indian Economic and Social Development (4 papers), South Asian Studies and Conflicts (4 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (3 papers), Social and Economic Development in India (3 papers) and Sports, Gender, and Society (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (120 citations), Political Science and International Relations (124 citations), Sociology and Political Science (187 citations), History (40 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (97 citations). Clive Dewey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include A. G. Hopkins, C. A. Bayly, Edward Ingram, N. Gerald Barrier, K. N. Chaudhuri, David Washbrook, Jan Breman, Cyril Ehrlich, Patrick Manning and E. J. Hobsbawm. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic History Review, The American Historical Review, Pacific Affairs, The International Journal of the History of Sport and Modern Asian Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact