Peter Hakim

428 citations
31 papers · 259 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Hakim

23 papers receiving 171 citations

Peers

Peter Hakim
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Development 60
  • Political Science and International Relations 136
  • Sociology and Political Science 97
  • Horticulture 2
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 15
Replace Robert J. Muscat with:
Robert J. Muscat United States
Andy Storey Ireland
Peter Lambert United Kingdom
Reginald Herbold Green United Kingdom
Jean‐Germain Gros United States
Ravi Arvind Palat United States
Mohammed Nuruzzaman Kuwait
Jean-Michel Severino France
Jiří Šedivý Czechia
Mareike Schomerus United Kingdom
Peter Hakim relative to Robert J. Muscat United States Robert J. Muscat's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Robert J. Muscat · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Hakim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Hakim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Hakim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Hakim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Hakim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Hakim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Hakim. The network helps show where Peter Hakim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Peter Hakim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Hakim Line = papers co-authored together Peter Hakim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200663
2 198832
3
The Future of North American Integration: Beyond NAFTA
200218
4 200418
5 197616
6 200313
7 200213
8
Development, reform, and malnutrition in Chile
197810
9 199310
10 201410
11 19998
12 20017
13 19926
14 19916
15 19765
16
Brasil: decisiones de una nueva potencia
20104
17 19794
18 19932
19 19952
20 20112

About Peter Hakim

Peter Hakim is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 31 papers that have together received 259 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Relations in Latin America (9 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (2 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (2 papers), Cuban History and Society (2 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (1 paper), Indigenous Health and Education (1 paper), Food, Nutrition, and Cultural Practices (1 paper) and Agricultural and Food Production Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Development (60 citations), Political Science and International Relations (136 citations), Sociology and Political Science (97 citations), Horticulture (2 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (15 citations). Peter Hakim has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Giorgio Solimano, Robert E. Litan, Abraham F. Lowenthal, Michael Shifter and R. Schlegel. Their work appears in journals such as Foreign Affairs, Journal of democracy, Current History, Value in Health and The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact