Andy Storey

468 citations
17 papers · 211 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Andy Storey

16 papers receiving 153 citations

Peers

Andy Storey
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Development 67
  • Political Science and International Relations 87
  • Sociology and Political Science 76
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11
  • Anthropology 17
Replace Rainer Tetzlaff with:
Rainer Tetzlaff Germany
René Otayek France
William J. Foltz United States
Tatiana Carayannis United States
Tanja Hohe
Robert A. Packenham United States
Ibbo Mandaza
Priya Lal United States
Mamoudou Gazibo Canada
Indrajit Roy United Kingdom
Andy Storey relative to Rainer Tetzlaff Germany Rainer Tetzlaff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×10×
Rainer Tetzlaff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andy Storey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andy Storey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andy Storey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andy Storey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andy Storey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andy Storey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andy Storey. The network helps show where Andy Storey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Andy Storey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andy Storey Line = papers co-authored together Andy Storey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 200649
2 200044
3 199923
4 199719
5 200117
6 200011
7 200810
8 19899
9 20059
10
Structural violence and the struggle for state power in Rwanda : what Arusha got wrong
20125
11 20084
12 20183
13 20193
14 20062
15 19941
16 20011
17
‘Normative or Realist’ versus ‘Normative and Realist’
20091

About Andy Storey

Andy Storey is a scholar working on Development, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History and Linguistics and Language, having authored 17 papers that have together received 211 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European Union Policy and Governance (6 papers), International Development and Aid (6 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (3 papers), Peacebuilding and International Security (2 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (2 papers), Economic and Social Issues (2 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (2 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (67 citations), Political Science and International Relations (87 citations), Sociology and Political Science (76 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (11 citations) and Anthropology (17 citations). Andy Storey has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Vincent Durac. Their work appears in journals such as Development in Practice, Food Policy, Journal of Contemporary African Studies, Critical Sociology and Community Development Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact