Stephen Hoadley
Impact in
- Development top 5%
- International Development and Aid
-
- International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Military and Defense Studies
- Global Political and Economic Relations
- International Relations in Latin America
Papers in
-
- International Relations and Foreign Policy 11
- Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies 5
- International Relations in Latin America 4
- Military History and Strategy 4
- Global Political and Economic Relations 4
-
- Asian Studies and History 8
- Political Conflict and Governance 6
Stephen Hoadley
25 papers receiving 177 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Development 25
- Political Science and International Relations 130
- Sociology and Political Science 103
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 17
- General Energy 2
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Hoadley
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Hoadley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Hoadley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Hoadley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Hoadley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Hoadley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Hoadley. The network helps show where Stephen Hoadley may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Hoadley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1978 | 71 | |
| 2 | 1980 | 26 | |
| 3 | 1981 | 26 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 22 | |
| 5 | 1978 | 11 | |
| 6 | 1973 | 10 | |
| 7 | Soldiers and Politics in Southeast Asia: Civil-Military Relations in Comparative Perspective, 1933-1975 | 1975 | 9 |
| 8 | 1978 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1980 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 7 | |
| 12 | 1973 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1980 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1977 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1971 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1976 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1980 | 2 | |
| 19 | Asian Security Reassessed | 2006 | 2 |
| 20 | The Politics of Transatlantic Trade Negotiations: TTIP in a Globalized World | 2016 | 2 |
About Stephen Hoadley
Stephen Hoadley is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Development and Demography, having authored 34 papers that have together received 242 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Relations and Foreign Policy (11 papers), Asian Studies and History (8 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (6 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (5 papers), Global trade and economics (4 papers), International Relations in Latin America (4 papers), Military History and Strategy (4 papers) and Global Political and Economic Relations (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (25 citations), Political Science and International Relations (130 citations), Sociology and Political Science (103 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (17 citations) and General Energy (2 citations). Stephen Hoadley has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jürgen Rüland. Their work appears in journals such as Pacific Affairs, Journal of Black Studies, World Development, Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs and New Zealand Geographer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.