Peter Good

2.4k citations
64 papers · 1.7k · h-index 23

Impact in

    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
    • Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
    • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Neurology top 5%
    • Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis

Papers in

    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders 6
    • Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity 4
    • Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome 4
    • Retinal Development and Disorders 9

Peter Good

62 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Peter Good
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Ophthalmology 388
  • Neurology 285
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 241
  • Neurology 76
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 51
Replace Florence Richard with:
Florence Richard France
Robert W. Hollenhorst United States
Bengt Hindfelt Sweden
Maria Laura Manca Italy
Kenneth Opeskin Australia
Chuanhui Dong United States
Lijun Hou China
John H. N. Deck Canada
Henry S. Schutta United States
E. Martino Italy
Peter Good relative to Florence Richard France Florence Richard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Florence Richard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Good

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Good's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Good with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Good more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Good

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Good. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Good. The network helps show where Peter Good may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Good, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Good Line = papers co-authored together Peter Good links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010235
2 1985138
3 199481
4 199765
5 199964
6 201562
7 199157
8 199756
9 200455
10 200050
11 199249
12 200243
13 201342
14 198942
15 199037
16 199434
17 199832
18 200832
19 201430
20 199529

About Peter Good

Peter Good is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Molecular Biology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migraine and Headache Studies (9 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (9 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (8 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (6 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (5 papers), Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity (4 papers), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (4 papers) and Retinal and Macular Surgery (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (388 citations), Neurology (285 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (241 citations), Neurology (76 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (51 citations). Peter Good has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include M.J. Mortimer, Michael Burdon, Robert A. H. Scott, Sarah Bundey, G R Kirkby, D R Blake, A S Jacks, Jeremy Tomlinson, E. A. Walker and Mark Lawden. Their work appears in journals such as Eye, Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain, Documenta Ophthalmologica, British Journal of Ophthalmology and Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact