Mark Lawden

2.3k citations
30 papers · 1.6k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

    • Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis 6
    • Vestibular and auditory disorders 3
    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders 6

Mark Lawden

29 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Mark Lawden
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Neurology 516
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 425
  • Ophthalmology 222
  • Gastroenterology 75
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 227
Replace Robert Dann with:
Robert Dann United States
F Gray France
Hsiao‐Fang Liang United States
Mark Manford United Kingdom
Anna Teresa Giallonardo Italy
Forbes H. Norris United States
L A Loizou United Kingdom
Carlo Di Bonaventura Italy
Giuseppe Gobbi Italy
Leonilda Bilo Italy
Mark Lawden relative to Robert Dann United States Robert Dann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15.8×
Robert Dann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Lawden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Lawden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Lawden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Lawden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Lawden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Lawden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Lawden. The network helps show where Mark Lawden may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Lawden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Lawden Line = papers co-authored together Mark Lawden links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997338
2 2010235
3 1999145
4 2008106
5 2010106
6 1993103
7 200194
8 201268
9 199565
10 200058
11 199954
12 198247
13 198342
14 199931
15 201530
16 199322
17 199520
18
Paroxysmal extreme pain disorder M1627K mutation in human Nav1.7 renders DRG neurons hyperexcitable
200814
19 199513
20 201412

About Mark Lawden

Mark Lawden is a scholar working on Neurology, Ophthalmology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 30 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (6 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (6 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (4 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (4 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (3 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (2 papers) and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (516 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (425 citations), Ophthalmology (222 citations), Gastroenterology (75 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (227 citations). Mark Lawden has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Tom Eke, J F Talbot, G. F. A. Harding, John M. Wild, Carl E Clarke, Michael Burdon, A S Jacks, Alexandra J. Sinclair, Christopher Kennard and Christopher Degg. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, Vision Research, Neurology, Movement Disorders and Journal of Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact