E C O'Neill

885 citations
20 papers · 702 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

E C O'Neill

20 papers receiving 663 citations

Peers

E C O'Neill
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Ophthalmology 411
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 114
  • Epidemiology 79
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 38
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 23
Replace James L. Kennerley Bankes with:
James L. Kennerley Bankes Mexico
Sampei Miyake Japan
Robert Laemmer Germany
Victor E. Malinovsky United States
Patricia Nelson United States
Anselm G M Juenemann Germany
Xiaoqin Yan China
Rashima Asokan India
Erkan Mutlukan United Kingdom
Chien‐Chia Su Taiwan
E C O'Neill relative to James L. Kennerley Bankes Mexico James L. Kennerley Bankes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
James L. Kennerley Bankes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E C O'Neill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E C O'Neill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E C O'Neill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E C O'Neill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E C O'Neill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E C O'Neill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E C O'Neill. The network helps show where E C O'Neill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside E C O'Neill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E C O'Neill Line = papers co-authored together E C O'Neill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Fatigue effects during a single session of automated static threshold perimetry.
1994130
2 198989
3
The SITA perimetric threshold algorithms in glaucoma.
199978
4 199165
5
The statistical interpretation of blue-on-yellow visual field loss.
199558
6 199150
7 199835
8 199832
9 199732
10 199325
11 198923
12 199419
13 199016
14
Intraocular foreign bodies. Indications for lensectomy and vitrectomy.
197812
15 198912
16 19897
17 19987
18 19986
19 19963
20 19933

About E C O'Neill

E C O'Neill is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 20 papers that have together received 702 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (16 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (4 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (4 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (3 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (2 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (2 papers) and Retinal and Macular Surgery (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (411 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (114 citations), Epidemiology (79 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (38 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (23 citations). E C O'Neill has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include John M. Wild, Chris Hudson, S. J. Crews, Ian E. Pacey, I A Cunliffe, Stephen Beatty, David Whitaker, Peter Good, David E. Shaw and Prachi Shah. Their work appears in journals such as Eye, Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina, British Journal of Ophthalmology and Acta Ophthalmologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact