Kenneth Opeskin

80 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Kenneth Opeskin
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Biological Psychiatry 86
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 640
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 431
  • Toxicology 57
  • Emergency Medicine 119
Replace Dennis J. Chute with:
Dennis J. Chute United States
Eric A. van Royen Netherlands
Maurizio Leone Italy
Corinna van den Heuvel Australia
Ursula Felderhoff‐Mueser Germany
Steven Choi United States
Michael Soyka Switzerland
Timo Kurki Finland
Thomas Christensen Denmark
Roger E. Kelley United States
Kenneth Opeskin relative to Dennis J. Chute United States Dennis J. Chute's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Dennis J. Chute · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth Opeskin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth Opeskin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth Opeskin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth Opeskin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth Opeskin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth Opeskin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth Opeskin. The network helps show where Kenneth Opeskin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kenneth Opeskin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kenneth Opeskin Line = papers co-authored together Kenneth Opeskin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999136
2
The density of muscarinic M1 receptors is decreased in the caudate-putamen of subjects with schizophrenia.
1996136
3 2003132
4 1996116
5 199297
6 200486
7 201280
8 200579
9 200065
10 201162
11 199859
12 200659
13 199559
14 199558
15 200253
16 200051
17 200050
18 199645
19 199942
20 199840

About Kenneth Opeskin

Kenneth Opeskin is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Neurology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Surgery, having authored 81 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (11 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (7 papers), Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries (7 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (6 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers), Restraint-Related Deaths (6 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (5 papers) and Lymphatic System and Diseases (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (86 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (640 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (431 citations), Toxicology (57 citations) and Emergency Medicine (119 citations). Kenneth Opeskin has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Brian Dean, Samuel F. Berkovic, Nicholas A Keks, Michael Burke, David Copolov, Elizabeth D. Williams, Christine Hill, Yiping Zeng, Geoffrey Pavey and Stephen Cordner. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology, Medicine Science and the Law, Schizophrenia Research, Forensic Science International and Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact