Peter Glick
Impact in
- Gender Studies top 0.01%
- Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Social Psychology top 0.05%
- Cultural Differences and Values
Papers in
-
- Gender Diversity and Inequality 40
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies 38
- Gender, Feminism, and Media 11
- Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies 7
-
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 48
- Work-Family Balance Challenges 5
- Co-authors
- Susan T. Fiske (29 shared papers)Amy J. C. Cuddy (10 shared papers)Jun Xu (2 shared papers)Laurie A. Rudman (4 shared papers)John F. Dovidio (3 shared papers)Victoria M. Esses (2 shared papers)Miles Hewstone (2 shared papers)Xu Juan (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Sex Roles (12 papers)Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (11 papers)Psychology of Women Quarterly (8 papers)Journal of Social Issues (8 papers)Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSpainTürkiye
In The Last Decade
Peter Glick
89 papers receiving 26.5k citations
Peter Glick's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
- Gender Studies 12.6k
- Social Psychology 9.0k
- Sociology and Political Science 17.1k
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 444
- Health 1.7k
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Glick
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Glick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Glick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Glick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Glick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Glick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Glick. The network helps show where Peter Glick may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Glick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 90 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Hit paper breakdown → | 2002 | 5146 |
| 2 | Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 3297 |
| 3 | The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Hit paper breakdown → | 1996 | 3245 |
| 4 | Warmth and Competence as Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map Hit paper breakdown → | 2008 | 1801 |
| 5 | The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Hit paper breakdown → | 2007 | 1473 |
| 6 | An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. Hit paper breakdown → | 2001 | 1378 |
| 7 | Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes and Backlash Toward Agentic Women Hit paper breakdown → | 2001 | 1343 |
| 8 | (Dis)respecting versus (Dis)liking: Status and Interdependence Predict Ambivalent Stereotypes of Competence and Warmth Hit paper breakdown → | 1999 | 710 |
| 9 | Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Hit paper breakdown → | 1999 | 671 |
| 10 | When Professionals Become Mothers, Warmth Doesn't Cut the Ice Hit paper breakdown → | 2004 | 626 |
| 11 | Hostile and Benevolent Sexism Hit paper breakdown → | 1997 | 623 |
| 12 | The dynamics of warmth and competence judgments, and their outcomes in organizations Hit paper breakdown → | 2011 | 509 |
| 13 | A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Hit paper breakdown → | 2002 | 509 |
| 14 | 2004 | 410 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 396 | |
| 16 | 1997 | 351 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 344 | |
| 18 | 1999 | 294 | |
| 19 | Work as a Masculinity Contest Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 280 |
| 20 | 1996 | 275 |
About Peter Glick
Peter Glick is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 90 papers that have together received 28.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (48 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (40 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (38 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (12 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (12 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (11 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (7 papers) and Work-Family Balance Challenges (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (12.6k citations), Social Psychology (9.0k citations), Sociology and Political Science (17.1k citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (444 citations) and Health (1.7k citations). Peter Glick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Susan T. Fiske, Amy J. C. Cuddy, Jun Xu, Laurie A. Rudman, John F. Dovidio, Victoria M. Esses, Miles Hewstone, Xu Juan, Miguel Moya and Nuray Sakallı. Their work appears in journals such as Sex Roles, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Psychology of Women Quarterly, Journal of Social Issues and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.